Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
7. First of all, you've misread my intent
Thu Mar 21, 2013, 12:22 AM
Mar 2013

Secondly, freedom from hatred is far more important, but that's by-the-by and I obviously need to clarify one or two things:

I'm a little bit disappointed that no-one suspected my post might have been delivered with tongue resting partially in cheek. Not sarcasm, a wry rumination on just what we consider completely sacred and unimpeachable against what we just accept the requirement of photo-ID for.

So we have censorship / age limits systems in place for movies, video games, porn and cigarettes; we know that. We also know that there's no question that the hate-filled extremism of SOME establishments is a bigger threat than any of the things I've listed that we accept limitations on, yet we accept that a seven year old child cannot go and buy Grand Theft Auto, and yet - for no good reason - that such an impressionable creature attending a church known to deliver hate-filled rhetoric is perfectly fine.

What good reason is there to accept one and not the other, especially given the relative harmlessness of the entertainment products?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»She's born-again. She's ...»Reply #7