Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lawrence O'Donnell's anti Clinton propoganda last night [View all]AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)57. strange indeed and strangely familiar
In Game Change, Palin got into a tizzy because she heard rumors about her husband belonging to a secessionist party (AIP) in Alaska. She was furious and demanded Steve Schmit squash the rumor, that it was a lie. Schmidt reminded her it was, in fact, the truth.
link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-dunn/sarah-palin-game-change_b_1314987.html
Palin Lied About her Husband's Involvement with the Alaska Independence Party. One of the things I sensed in my interviews with Schmidt -- who consistently came off as a bright, sensitive, nuts-and-bolts, down-to-earth guy during our conversations -- is that Palin's penchant for veering from the truth is what ultimately turned him against her.
During the campaign, Palin became irritated with published reports that her husband had been a member of the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP), the platform of which called for the secession of Alaska from the United States.
She demanded, in an email sent to McCain campaign manager Rick Davis, chief strategist Steve Schmidt and senior advisor Nicolle Wallace, that the campaign "get in front of that ridiculous issue" and release a statement contradicting the charges. Schmidt refused to issue one. He knew that Todd Palin had been an AIP member and that secession was a central AIP platform.
But Palin could not let it go. Her response was thoroughly duplicitous:
It was a bold-faced lie. Todd Palin's voter registration forms, provided through a Public Records Act request that I initiated with the State of Alaska Department of Elections, reveal that Todd Palin registered for the AIP on three separate occasions. (PDF) Schmidt was not amused by Palin's duplicity -- and he called her on it. "The statement you are suggesting be released," he wrote, "would be inaccurate." He informed Palin that the campaign would "not put out a statement and inflame [the situation]." Palin was furious.
Palin Lied About her Husband's Involvement with the Alaska Independence Party. One of the things I sensed in my interviews with Schmidt -- who consistently came off as a bright, sensitive, nuts-and-bolts, down-to-earth guy during our conversations -- is that Palin's penchant for veering from the truth is what ultimately turned him against her.
During the campaign, Palin became irritated with published reports that her husband had been a member of the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP), the platform of which called for the secession of Alaska from the United States.
She demanded, in an email sent to McCain campaign manager Rick Davis, chief strategist Steve Schmidt and senior advisor Nicolle Wallace, that the campaign "get in front of that ridiculous issue" and release a statement contradicting the charges. Schmidt refused to issue one. He knew that Todd Palin had been an AIP member and that secession was a central AIP platform.
But Palin could not let it go. Her response was thoroughly duplicitous:
That's not part of their platform and he was only a 'member' bc independent alaskans too often check that 'Alaska Independent' box on voter registrations thinking it just means non partisan. He caught his error when changing our address and checked the right box. I still want it fixed.
It was a bold-faced lie. Todd Palin's voter registration forms, provided through a Public Records Act request that I initiated with the State of Alaska Department of Elections, reveal that Todd Palin registered for the AIP on three separate occasions. (PDF) Schmidt was not amused by Palin's duplicity -- and he called her on it. "The statement you are suggesting be released," he wrote, "would be inaccurate." He informed Palin that the campaign would "not put out a statement and inflame [the situation]." Palin was furious.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well BLM, if anyone can explain the Clintons to DU, it's you. Good Luck with that though
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#14
She still is a warhawk. If it were up to her we'd be at war with Iran right now IMO. n/t
L0oniX
Mar 2013
#108
The Clintons deserve all the criticism they've received on this anniversary.
Moses2SandyKoufax
Mar 2013
#2
He knows how cozy the Clintons have been w/ the Bush family & how they allowed the Dem. party to
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#7
Somewhat, but, we'd be 10trillion times better off if Bush's tax and economic policies had NOT
blm
Mar 2013
#33
Actually they do get ongoing CIA briefings. It's part of the perks of ex-presidenting
Bucky
Mar 2013
#31
Baloney - Bill Clinton had access as president to classified intel that senators never had
blm
Mar 2013
#34
I agree that Blair and Dem lawmakers SHOULD NOT have trusted Bill Clinton on Iraq, dsc.
blm
Mar 2013
#37
Bill used his power to support war and Bush's decision to go to war. He knew exactly
blm
Mar 2013
#114
And now the "clenis" and Bushes are best friends! They call Bill their son!!!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Mar 2013
#137
Propaganda? As in you're claiming she DIDN'T make those comments or vote for the war?
Poll_Blind
Mar 2013
#15
Sometimes having a successful political career means voting against your conscience.
Generation_Why
Mar 2013
#19
O'Donnell isn't running a propaganda campaign against Hillary. He ran the truth and
blm
Mar 2013
#36
Troops stuck in Iraq ring a bell? HeyJohn website that received instant attention from Politico?
blm
Mar 2013
#47
How uninformed would one have to be to think the only Dem supporting Iraq war was Hillary?
blm
Mar 2013
#66
That example is absurd. No one is STUPID enough to believe that O'Donnell was trying
blm
Mar 2013
#69
You're right, Hillary and Lieberman were on the exact same page - he could've used Joe
blm
Mar 2013
#80
It's not a RW attack piece on Dean - It's RW CATO support for Dean's centrism. You said I repeated
blm
Mar 2013
#96
Get a life, dsc - you chose excerpts that I did not, moving the goalposts as you always do.
blm
Mar 2013
#112
You missed the point entirely - Moore wrote about Dean glowingly years before primary.
blm
Mar 2013
#120
Big deal, dsc - I posted Moore's earlier thoughts on Dean, you didn't like it so you post
blm
Mar 2013
#125
Troops stuck in Iraq ring a bell? HeyJohn website that received instant attention from Politico?
blm
Mar 2013
#48
sniff...sniff...sniff...The meany O'Donnell didn't give Hillary's bullshit a pass
TheKentuckian
Mar 2013
#53
They did the first part - and more - using cherry picked sentences out of context - in 2005.
karynnj
Mar 2013
#140
I saw that segment, and came away with a completely different impression. The wonders of modern....
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2013
#59
Come on, the Clintons created the DLC. They have always been Republican-Lite.
Zen Democrat
Mar 2013
#73
Yes, I'll vote a Repub/lite over a crazy conservative too, but we should have better choices. n/t
whathehell
Mar 2013
#79
I know - this rewriting of Clinton's time in the senate and at State is just amazing to me.
blm
Mar 2013
#97
I think some Irish men freak over matriarchs, because they grew up in the Irish-American matriarchy.
McCamy Taylor
Mar 2013
#142