Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(7,170 posts)
37. I think there are several valid issues...
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 08:28 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:07 PM - Edit history (2)

...and several reasonable opinions with respect to them.

One issue is the FERPA rule changes. The WaPo article mentions that the regulations were changed to allow sharing of information with non-academic government departments. It is also stated that student data can be shared by local officials with private companies and foundations if they are doing work for the school to achieve a public purpose.

This is certainly a valid issue. On the one hand, there is a concrete, specific reason for the change: allowing for "the effective use of data in statewide longitudinal data systems (SLDS) as envisioned in the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act (COMPETES Act) and furthermore supported under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Improved access to data contained within an SLDS will facilitate States’ ability to evaluate education programs, to build upon what works and discard what does not, to increase accountability and transparency, and to contribute to a culture of innovation and continuous improvement in education."

On the other hand is the concern that information about specific students could be accidentally or maliciously released or pilfered. That is a real, perhaps small, possibility, and there is definitely a trade-off between the benefit from the use of the data to improve education for our children and the danger of accidental or malicious release.

This is a concern for any data system, educational or not. Credit scoring systems, government tax records, medical records, etc., etc. An opinion one way or the other in any specific case may be reasonable, and some folks are more risk averse than others. I happen to think the advantages of using this data for the betterment of our education system and our children out weighs the possibility that the data may be misused. I don't think the risk of that happening is all that great and I think the possibilities for improving our educational system are real.

Just my opinion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

TPTB don't care what we think or what is right. madfloridian Mar 2013 #1
What do parents here think about this privacy invasion? madfloridian Mar 2013 #2
Huge K&R, woo me with science Mar 2013 #3
Gee. Aren't corporations pupils? Octafish Mar 2013 #4
Ah, great link to PURE. It is scary stuff. Where's the outrage? madfloridian Mar 2013 #5
oh, I won't forget or give up. liberal_at_heart Mar 2013 #6
K & R proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #7
+1 DonRedwood Mar 2013 #9
Well said. hay rick Mar 2013 #8
As a teacher it does feel like both parties must be in on the destruction of public education. DonRedwood Mar 2013 #10
I agree with you about that. liberal_at_heart Mar 2013 #13
Unfortunately they are. madfloridian Mar 2013 #34
^ Wilms Mar 2013 #11
I think the issue is being misrepresented. After reading the Ruters article.... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #12
Of course it's a privacy issue. madfloridian Mar 2013 #14
I don't think this is an acurate characterization of "the database". reACTIONary Mar 2013 #17
Read the part about sharing without letting parents know or opt out. madfloridian Mar 2013 #27
I think there are several valid issues... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #37
RE: Rupert Murdoch / Bill Gates reACTIONary Mar 2013 #39
I only imagine what UK politicians et al whose phones were hacked think of what we have done. madfloridian Mar 2013 #40
Why not spend this money to fully fund the schools; create small class sizes, hire teachers with liberal_at_heart Mar 2013 #15
Good idea. madfloridian Mar 2013 #16
Money is not an educational resource until... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #19
Ooh...why not let educators in on the act? madfloridian Mar 2013 #24
What privatization???? I don't understand... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #25
I have written much about it. You can do a search. OR a general google search. madfloridian Mar 2013 #26
What I was wondering about is more of a definitional question... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #38
Why not do both? And, while you are at it... reACTIONary Mar 2013 #18
I like your "avatar", BTW. (NT) reACTIONary Mar 2013 #20
The Obama administration never met a corrupt corporation it didn't want to help make richer forestpath Mar 2013 #21
k&r Starry Messenger Mar 2013 #22
Rupert Murdoch is quite possibly the single worst human being alive. Initech Mar 2013 #23
Scary stuff. I am really disappointed in Bill Gates. Mojorabbit Mar 2013 #28
When he said teachers don't improve after 3 years.... madfloridian Mar 2013 #29
Gates needs to go back to school Rex Mar 2013 #31
Dealing with a known criminal, how pathetic. Rex Mar 2013 #30
Recommend... KoKo Mar 2013 #32
Murdoch hit by 600 new claims of phone hacking, yet we trust him with our students' privacy. madfloridian Mar 2013 #33
we know how much murdoch respects privacy. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #35
Giving him access to private student info...stunning. madfloridian Mar 2013 #36
The undoing of public education wasn't enough, they need to eliminate privacy too. Jefferson23 Mar 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPIC sues Dept of Ed for ...»Reply #37