Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
62. You seem to enjoy using that term. ...
Fri Mar 22, 2013, 09:06 PM
Mar 2013

For example:


As mentioned in a post above, what the non-vote did is buy NRA & gun fuckers some time till the next massacre {We got lucky at UCF}. Then we can start the bullshit ALL over again. Gun fucks will express their emotion in surrounding themselves with loved ones by buying more guns....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2552762


For some reason I get the feeling that you lump many gun owners who recently bought assault weapons under that term. Many who have an actual use for an assault weapon decided to buy an assault weapon now as they are worried that if they wait such a firearm will cost a small fortune. Some bought one as an investment hoping to profit later. Some bought one as when anything is banned, people want it. A very,very few bought one to use to slaughter people in a mass murder. The media has portrayed the AR-15 style rifles as "mass murder machines" and there is no doubt that advertising works. Perhaps that's the type of person you meant to describe by using "gun fuckers." I personally would call them individuals with severe mental issues that really need professional help.

Now I have a very thick skin and insults merely bounce off. Unfortunately many gun owners will read your post and miss the point you were attempting to make which was that the non-vote was a bad idea as it merely allows more people time to buy assault weapons before the next massacre finally leads to the AWB being passed. (As I interpret it.)

I personally believe that Harry Reid made a wise decision as he didn't have the votes to pass the AWB and he realizes that he might conceivably lose his majority in the Senate by forcing the losing effort.

Although I don't support the AWB, I have no problem with you doing so. There is always the chance that the AWB will pass in the future but that chance decreases significantly if at the midterm elections, the Republicans gain control or increase the number of seats they hold in the Senate.

Also remember that each state gets two Senators. Therefore Montana has the same number of votes as does California. Even if the majority of votes in the United States want the AWB passed they can be stopped by the minority of voters who live in gun friendly Red Sates.

The best chance for gun control advocates like you is to ever get an AWB is to wait for the next opportunity and meanwhile to pass the gun control legislation that is possible. It is not wise to force a vote that will give up control of the Senate to the Republicans as that will not only ruin the chances of any AWB in the future but might well ruin all the progress the Democratic Party has been able to accomplish since Bush the Junior left office.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The AWB is not dead. It will be voted on separately. Tx4obama Mar 2013 #1
you miss the point of the article bossy22 Mar 2013 #3
I did the same... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #44
Can't get more than 40 senators, never mind 60, never mind the house. X_Digger Mar 2013 #65
It will be resuscitated after the next assault weapon massacre. sadbear Mar 2013 #2
as usual bossy22 Mar 2013 #4
The more I hear from gun freaks... 99Forever Mar 2013 #6
so someone who is against a measure that is mostly symbolic bossy22 Mar 2013 #10
Save it for... 99Forever Mar 2013 #13
i don't care if it sounds hollow if its the truth bossy22 Mar 2013 #15
That's right bud. 99Forever Mar 2013 #22
and that's alright by you? bossy22 Mar 2013 #26
Strawman much? 99Forever Mar 2013 #28
how is being so stubborn in your convictions bossy22 Mar 2013 #36
I don't answer bullshit questions. 99Forever Mar 2013 #37
its not bullshit bossy22 Mar 2013 #40
Another one bites the dust. 99Forever Mar 2013 #42
"You don't need an assault weapon to carry out a massacre." Aristus Mar 2013 #25
but the AWB allows much more than flint locks bossy22 Mar 2013 #27
I don't give a shit about pistol grips, for fuck's sake! Aristus Mar 2013 #31
THAT'S ALL THE BILL DOES! bossy22 Mar 2013 #38
The bill says nothing about speed of firing or of reloading. It's literally about things like... slackmaster Mar 2013 #47
None of which are addressed by an "assault weapon" ban. X_Digger Mar 2013 #61
Nice (absolute non-)rebuttal. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2013 #33
You think I'm concerned... 99Forever Mar 2013 #34
I thought you were concerned about gun violence? bossy22 Mar 2013 #39
Probably not... Lizzie Poppet Mar 2013 #50
Should have left it at "Probably not..." 99Forever Mar 2013 #54
Good call. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2013 #57
Ahhh... 99Forever Mar 2013 #59
Save your logic for someone who isn't emotional and scared? Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #45
Welcome to DU. 99Forever Mar 2013 #46
Lovely what? Kingofalldems Mar 2013 #63
Brace Yourself For A Lot Of Those "Symbolic Measures," Then. Paladin Mar 2013 #7
Yup - while gun fucks will keep expressing their emotion by buying more jmg257 Mar 2013 #9
don't you think that attitude might be part of the problem with the debate bossy22 Mar 2013 #12
MY attitude, you mean? I could give a shit about 'the gun culture'. jmg257 Mar 2013 #16
"gun culture" and "gun violence" are not the same culture to many bossy22 Mar 2013 #21
That's wonderful. But the problem here is your reading comprehension. jmg257 Mar 2013 #30
apologies bossy22 Mar 2013 #41
You must hate children... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #48
Who knows, COULD be he doesn't have any of his own, or hasn't known one or seen one jmg257 Mar 2013 #56
Agreed. Nor did I say that either. Sorry if I gave that impression. nt jmg257 Mar 2013 #53
I agree. If it doesn't pass this time then the next time... Tx4obama Mar 2013 #5
The bill has been written and re-written almost every year since 2004. Clames Mar 2013 #43
And every time it gets proposed, more folks buy them.. X_Digger Mar 2013 #68
I think annual AR rifle production in the few years before 1994 was less than 70k. Clames Mar 2013 #71
At least 970k in 2012, per the NSSF. n/t X_Digger Mar 2013 #72
Newtown was not an assault weapon massacre krispos42 Mar 2013 #67
Not really. Colorado just signed new laws into effect. jmg257 Mar 2013 #8
are you so sure of that? bossy22 Mar 2013 #11
Yes - 100%. Reality is that another massacre or 2 will continue to change things. jmg257 Mar 2013 #14
i looked above, there isn't anything. bossy22 Mar 2013 #18
You keep saying "dipping" and 'WON'T be on people's minds'. I agree. Right up until jmg257 Mar 2013 #24
it has lasted longer bossy22 Mar 2013 #35
'Till the next massacre". Then it WILL start ALL over again...but farther along then it was. jmg257 Mar 2013 #58
You obviously believe that responsible and sane gun owners are not horrified by ... spin Mar 2013 #49
"obviously believe that responsible and sane gun owners are not horrified"? jmg257 Mar 2013 #51
You seem to enjoy using that term. ... spin Mar 2013 #62
I often lump numerous gun owners together. More so recently with the sudden wave jmg257 Mar 2013 #64
Over the years I have learned not to lump people together. ... spin Mar 2013 #66
You make numerous good points. Keeping cool and keeping jmg257 Mar 2013 #70
I think we have had a interesting and productive discussion. ... spin Mar 2013 #73
No. Lack of representing the people's interest killed the AWB n/t HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #17
EO's didn't need a vote and there is still hope for background checks etc. One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #19
Are you suggesting that Pres. Obama can issue an EO banning assault weapons? premium Mar 2013 #20
Suggesting he singed 23 EO's on gun safety One_Life_To_Give Mar 2013 #29
I agree with you. premium Mar 2013 #32
that's the point bossy22 Mar 2013 #23
No, we'll still have universal background checks... Deep13 Mar 2013 #52
NO. BUT It ended the career of probably about 155 house 20 senators who will lose by 2020. graham4anything Mar 2013 #55
Keep dreaming. badtoworse Mar 2013 #69
No, NRA 'killed' gun control. elleng Mar 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did the Assault Weapons B...»Reply #62