Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My bad sex wasn’t rape [View all]dsc
(53,377 posts)32. just to clarify
It isn't a defense to say the victim told me she was older. Even in cases where the victim was in a bar and being served alcohol, that still isn't a defense against statutory rape.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
210 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But not in many European countries, or until very recently in Canada.
Jackpine Radical
Mar 2013
#133
yeah, because it would have just been ok for grown men to drink and have sex with 16 year olds
JI7
Mar 2013
#10
Many, many men claim it's natural and normal, and even argue that it should be legal.
redqueen
Mar 2013
#28
An 11 yr old is incapable of making proper judgments. That's why they're called children.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#8
dreck, because she's so very dishonest by omitting her prior history of sexual abuse and acting out
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#33
You're making nasty statements about what this woman has said around being an abuse survivor?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#61
Critical analysis that her piece completely lacked context is nasty now? I think her
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#70
Okay- here's what I'm saying. You're talking, it seems, about something she wrote in a diff. piece
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#138
yeah, I think she left out details and context in this article and that's why it's BS flame bait
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#148
So you acknowledge that you've been banned from DU so many times that you need to proxy your IP.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#173
You don't need to, you admit it in the comments of your blog. Just now you admitted that's you
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#177
you blogged about being banned from DU last year. So either you've been here before, or
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#186
No, turns out that was another repeat disruptor, dude from Canada with a penchant for going off the
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#189
Your previous times here, you spoke of "FAABs","Womyn-born-womyn", "gynergy vampires", and the rest.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#201
Legally, you were raped by the 19 year old. Statutory rape. You were not old enough to "allow it."
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#6
No, it's true. Post 97 gives a few far out hypotheticals that don't even apply
Honeycombe8
Mar 2013
#136
she is the writer who wrote- a little too wistfully- about her father's abuse. I don't think she
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#17
Yeah, I think she is being used by her publisher. Whatever she was trying to say is muddled up
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#92
RAPE. she doesn't identify correctly digital penetration of a child as rape. soft-pedaling seems
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#43
Yep: "Some lovers you just never forget." about her and Dad.... trigger warning....
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#115
That article wasn't written by the author of the OP. The one at this link was written by Delaney
smokey nj
Mar 2013
#121
yes they are. i was confused too, and saw she changed her name after that article.
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#172
ha ha, yeah. poor woman apparently still loves all the attention, then regrets getting it...
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#120
Ironically, she writes about her many unhappy years allowing men to use her.....
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#72
Of course "bad sex" isn't necessarily rape. Anybody with any sense knows that.
nomorenomore08
Mar 2013
#20
she was sexually abused as a child, and part of her shtick is to be a bit too ambivalent about it.
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#26
She got a lot of attention for the first piece, and they are looking for readers. I'm not kidding
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#71
it sounds to me like she is saying, what happened in steubenville, girls and her are not rapes. nt
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#37
yeah- when you have to reread and check for the parenthetical to be certain she can finally call
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#79
if you read back to her earlier article, you can see she has serious issues faulting herself
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#90
the OP is posting an article from salon, not speaking from personal experience, I think.
niyad
Mar 2013
#46
I wasn't really saying anything. Just injecting some humor. But I'll clarify MY stance:
Generation_Why
Mar 2013
#122
so totally passed out is your standard here for rape? And you think a "yes" is too much trouble
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#149
The problem I see with this article is that the author assumes that whether what was done to her
Egalitarian Thug
Mar 2013
#75
"The idea that what happened in Steubenville, with Natalia on “Girls,” and with me in the park 30
lunasun
Mar 2013
#80
Legally, it doesn't matter if she doesn't "feel" it was rape. If she was unable to give consent
Lex
Mar 2013
#83
Some people in this thread don't have a lot of knowledge about statutory rape laws.
phleshdef
Mar 2013
#97
if she is unable to call digital penetration of a six year old rape I will trash her WRITING about
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#105
Who's trashing her? Being angry at the fact that she's working so hard to blur lines does not
redqueen
Mar 2013
#106
some people think it's okay for her to write about that- or hide it from readers to manipulate them
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#156
No, not "a sentence (I) didn't like"... a whole bunch of noxious crap about "Daddy".
redqueen
Mar 2013
#157
i said her opinion about using the word "rape" was worthless, and I stand by it.
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#151
are we not allowed to critique work by any writers who've been sexually abused?
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#155
I'm using the stories she tells about herself to give context to the stories about herself.
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#161
you still don't understand the difference between attacking the work, and attacking the person?
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#170
she is attempting OPED journalism, for fuck's sake. and doing it dishonestly, and pandering
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#175
Sometimes group behavior causes the very feelings we want a victim to not feel.
randome
Mar 2013
#147
I don't get it- I criticized HER PIECE for omitting her whole history of sexually acting out....
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#154
that would be relevant- if every bullet pointed item in that list wasn't bullshit.
bettyellen
Mar 2013
#191
Yup.. and, as expected, the responses to you are worth at least 2 squares on the bingo card..
opiate69
Mar 2013
#199