Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lawrence O'Donnell's anti Clinton propoganda last night [View all]pscot
(21,044 posts)111. I'm sure many American Jews opposed the Iraq invasion
But the perception was that most of the Jewish community was in favor of it. This article from Salon back in 2002 represents the way I remember it:
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, of course, has made it policy to support whatever Bush decides to do on Iraq. But even some liberal Jewish leaders favor invading Baghdad. Rabbi David Saperstein, a liberal Washington lobbyist who heads the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, which represents 1.5 million American Jews, usually acts as a bulwark against the excesses of the right. Yet about a war with Iraq, he says, The Jewish community would want to see a forceful resolution to the threat that Saddam Hussein poses.
Theres near-unanimity among mainstream Jewish groups about the need for the U.S. to confront that threat. Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, says, In the American Jewish community, theres a great deal of support for the presidents stand. And David Harris, deputy executive director of the American Jewish Democratic Council, argues that American and Israeli interests on Iraq mesh: Whats good for Israel is good for America, because it lends stability to the region and because its a strategic ally.
Support for the war from the leaders of a traditionally Democratic bloc creates a potentially perilous situation for any Democrat tempted to oppose the administrations Iraq plans. In fact, among Jewish lobbyists in the Beltway, support for the impending war is almost taken for granted several are puzzled by the very suggestion that any kind of strenuous opposition to an Iraq invasion might emerge. This pains some old-school Jewish lefties, who see the weakening of a traditional constraint on Republican excess and who fear that Jews will take the blame should the war go wrong.
Theres near-unanimity among mainstream Jewish groups about the need for the U.S. to confront that threat. Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, says, In the American Jewish community, theres a great deal of support for the presidents stand. And David Harris, deputy executive director of the American Jewish Democratic Council, argues that American and Israeli interests on Iraq mesh: Whats good for Israel is good for America, because it lends stability to the region and because its a strategic ally.
Support for the war from the leaders of a traditionally Democratic bloc creates a potentially perilous situation for any Democrat tempted to oppose the administrations Iraq plans. In fact, among Jewish lobbyists in the Beltway, support for the impending war is almost taken for granted several are puzzled by the very suggestion that any kind of strenuous opposition to an Iraq invasion might emerge. This pains some old-school Jewish lefties, who see the weakening of a traditional constraint on Republican excess and who fear that Jews will take the blame should the war go wrong.
http://www.salon.com/2002/09/14/jews_iraq/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well BLM, if anyone can explain the Clintons to DU, it's you. Good Luck with that though
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#14
She still is a warhawk. If it were up to her we'd be at war with Iran right now IMO. n/t
L0oniX
Mar 2013
#108
The Clintons deserve all the criticism they've received on this anniversary.
Moses2SandyKoufax
Mar 2013
#2
He knows how cozy the Clintons have been w/ the Bush family & how they allowed the Dem. party to
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#7
Somewhat, but, we'd be 10trillion times better off if Bush's tax and economic policies had NOT
blm
Mar 2013
#33
Actually they do get ongoing CIA briefings. It's part of the perks of ex-presidenting
Bucky
Mar 2013
#31
Baloney - Bill Clinton had access as president to classified intel that senators never had
blm
Mar 2013
#34
I agree that Blair and Dem lawmakers SHOULD NOT have trusted Bill Clinton on Iraq, dsc.
blm
Mar 2013
#37
Bill used his power to support war and Bush's decision to go to war. He knew exactly
blm
Mar 2013
#114
And now the "clenis" and Bushes are best friends! They call Bill their son!!!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Mar 2013
#137
Propaganda? As in you're claiming she DIDN'T make those comments or vote for the war?
Poll_Blind
Mar 2013
#15
Sometimes having a successful political career means voting against your conscience.
Generation_Why
Mar 2013
#19
O'Donnell isn't running a propaganda campaign against Hillary. He ran the truth and
blm
Mar 2013
#36
Troops stuck in Iraq ring a bell? HeyJohn website that received instant attention from Politico?
blm
Mar 2013
#47
How uninformed would one have to be to think the only Dem supporting Iraq war was Hillary?
blm
Mar 2013
#66
That example is absurd. No one is STUPID enough to believe that O'Donnell was trying
blm
Mar 2013
#69
You're right, Hillary and Lieberman were on the exact same page - he could've used Joe
blm
Mar 2013
#80
It's not a RW attack piece on Dean - It's RW CATO support for Dean's centrism. You said I repeated
blm
Mar 2013
#96
Get a life, dsc - you chose excerpts that I did not, moving the goalposts as you always do.
blm
Mar 2013
#112
You missed the point entirely - Moore wrote about Dean glowingly years before primary.
blm
Mar 2013
#120
Big deal, dsc - I posted Moore's earlier thoughts on Dean, you didn't like it so you post
blm
Mar 2013
#125
Troops stuck in Iraq ring a bell? HeyJohn website that received instant attention from Politico?
blm
Mar 2013
#48
sniff...sniff...sniff...The meany O'Donnell didn't give Hillary's bullshit a pass
TheKentuckian
Mar 2013
#53
They did the first part - and more - using cherry picked sentences out of context - in 2005.
karynnj
Mar 2013
#140
I saw that segment, and came away with a completely different impression. The wonders of modern....
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2013
#59
Come on, the Clintons created the DLC. They have always been Republican-Lite.
Zen Democrat
Mar 2013
#73
Yes, I'll vote a Repub/lite over a crazy conservative too, but we should have better choices. n/t
whathehell
Mar 2013
#79
I know - this rewriting of Clinton's time in the senate and at State is just amazing to me.
blm
Mar 2013
#97
I think some Irish men freak over matriarchs, because they grew up in the Irish-American matriarchy.
McCamy Taylor
Mar 2013
#142