General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Lawrence O'Donnell's anti Clinton propoganda last night [View all]dsc
(53,413 posts)i think if the person is a liar, the article has lies, then nothing in the article should be believed. That is why I don't believe things you post unless I see links because far too many times you have avered that an article said x only to find when I traced it down, the article said y. It happened with Gary Hart, it happened here, it happened over and over and over and over again. You repeatedly told us Dean endorsed Jeffords for Senate. You were asked for a link or failing that at least the race in which he had done this. To this very day, you have given us nada. It is your MO. Oh, and the insults you have repeatedly decided to use in this thread, yep part of your MO too. You called me a liar, you called me a net nanny, you repeatedly told stories you liked about what I posted and when caught blamed me for that too. Nothing is ever your fault, words mean only what you want them to mean, and any source, no matter how many lies they tell are AOK with you if they hate Dean and Clinton enough. You claimed earlier you wouldn't quote Hannity, well Moore is Hannity with an economics degree.