Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
142. Okay. To start, "Opinion" can mean several different things.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 03:51 AM
Feb 2012

I'm saying the opinion that one person is entitled to make that decision FOR another person, in any case, is not to my mind, valid. That's MY opinion.

Can I stop people from having that opinion? Obviously not.

A woman with a hysterectomy has the same rights, to my mind, as everyone else- i.e. she has autonomy over HER body. The abortion "question" is moot, in her case, is it is in yours and mine, because she doesn't have a uterus and she's not going to get pregnant.

Let's look at Gay Marriage. Do I grok that some people have all sorts of meddlesome opinions which make them believe that they're entitled to tell gay people they've never met that they shouldn't be able to legally get married? Yes, some people do. And yes, I think that "opinion" is bullshit. Do I think that all opinions about gay marriage are created equal? No. I do not. I think that what is valid is respecting the idea that people should have fundamental RIGHTS to self-determination, and that includes the right of gay people to decide for themselves whether to marry each other or not, legally.

Don't like abortion? Don't have one. Don't like gay marriage? Don't have a gay wedding.

Now, you want to play the classic anti-choice game about DNA and life from conception and all this other yibber yabber like we haven't heard it fifty bajillion times before, sort of like the glassy-eyed jesus thumper at my door somehow imagines I've never managed to be exposed to the "good news" in my 5 or so decades on this planet, and oh how fortunate for me that finally someone has shown up to clue me in.

Your sperm is alive. Unfertilized eggs are alive. They also have different DNA, and different unique combinations of DNA. Do they deserve "rights"? The anti-choice delusion; and it's based upon religious dogma and nothing more, is that somehow at the moment of conception some magic action happens in the fertilization of the egg whereby these two living gametes with the same 46 total (23+23) chromosomes which will end up in the zygote, magically transmogrify at that instant into a "baby" with rights. Magic.

This:



Is NOT a Baby. Understand?


And we can add another tick in your disingenuous column. It is the anti-choice crowd who are unable to distinguish between a single cell and a baby "five minutes before birth". How many abortions are taking place 5 minutes before birth? Got any numbers for that, Mr. Numbers? Oh, I know that your average, bloviating right wing AM hate radio asshat loves to float shit about the women running around pregnant for 8 months and then aborting because they "look fat", right up there with the bon-bon eating welfare queen who takes the limo to buy vodka with food stamps... but the FACT is- the STATISTICAL FACT (you know, with those planned parenthood numbers you seem to think you're scoring points by flogging upthread) is that the vast majority of abortions- over 90%, in most analyses, take place before 12 weeks in gestational age. Roe v. Wade and the Casey decision both recognize that a fertilized egg and a baby "five minutes before birth" are NOT the same thing.

The only people saying they ARE the same thing are the people who want to outlaw abortion and birth control.

I think our shared philosophical viewpoint dictates that the issue of whether his mother should have an abortion is an issue in which society as a whole has an interest, and the opinions of members of society are entitled to be expressed -


You do? I don't. I don't think that "society has a whole" has any business being inside a woman's uterus, inside people's bedrooms, inside their bloodstreams, or inside their pants. I recognize that the one and only person qualified to make decisions about a pregnancy is THE WOMAN IN WHOSE BODY THE PREGNANCY IS TAKING PLACE. Period. End of fucking discussion.

Oh, don't get me wrong- you can "express your opinion" all you want- the First Amendment protects that- and as a member of the pro-choice majority in this country, I will respond by saying I think you should worry about controlling your own fucking body, and not anyone else's.



Understand?





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Are_grits_groceries Feb 2012 OP
any money i may have donated to susan g komen barbtries Feb 2012 #1
+1 Scuba Feb 2012 #144
I like Juanita Jean's response hobbit709 Feb 2012 #2
Brilliant JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #3
Yep! Delphinus Feb 2012 #4
Might this make a good OP? JNelson6563 Feb 2012 #5
She's a Right Winger - anti LGBT as well. ehrnst Feb 2012 #9
K&R-ing this thread so this idea gets seen renate Feb 2012 #10
I just went to the PP website and donated.. ananda Feb 2012 #82
Just sent a donation in her name. Hope she enjoys all the cards! likesmountains 52 Feb 2012 #111
I'll do that ... and send some wire coat-hangers to Komen. TahitiNut Feb 2012 #156
I'm saving my pittance of donatable $$ for the DU heart drive for PP Kali Feb 2012 #165
Karen Handel is an outspoken anti-choicer obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #6
I have to correct the factual inaccuracies in your post Zebedeo Feb 2012 #11
My post was correct, you can use your stats however you wish obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #12
OK. In what other contexts would you consider 332,278 Zebedeo Feb 2012 #19
You're not reading before you post...she said abortions is one of the joeybee12 Feb 2012 #20
No. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #22
And? That's great. lapislzi Feb 2012 #24
Then at least YOU are intellectually honest Zebedeo Feb 2012 #30
Who is saying abortion is a 'wonderful' thing? Access to health care services, including abortion Fuzz Feb 2012 #40
Posters in this thread Zebedeo Feb 2012 #44
Who is being "intellectually dishonest" now? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #48
Who said that they want the number to increase? And, your quotes from your own post mislead. yardwork Feb 2012 #69
Post #39, for example Zebedeo Feb 2012 #84
Too chicken to address me directly. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #108
"They want the number to increase" trumad Feb 2012 #79
What's that got to do with saying people find abortions are a 'wonderful' thing? Fuzz Feb 2012 #101
It's because we don't care about the number obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #46
I can think of one reason. laundry_queen Feb 2012 #77
I'll take the bullet for you. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #83
Nothing that I have posted in this thread, or any thread on DU Zebedeo Feb 2012 #88
Ain't plausible deniability worderful? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #95
You really can't stand the reality of that 3% of services obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #102
Or 15% of income, which is still a minor fraction. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #114
What I would celebrate... ananda Feb 2012 #80
In every context obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #26
SMH Mr Dixon Feb 2012 #62
In 2008, there were 1,211,500 abortions performed in all of the US REP Feb 2012 #70
Thank God they didn't have to resort to back alley butchers! annabanana Feb 2012 #119
Thank you, annabanana! Carolina Feb 2012 #158
Okay, so there are roughly 115,000 kids awaiting adoption in foster care right now justiceischeap Feb 2012 #150
From the same Wikipedia article... JHB Feb 2012 #13
Yup, I edited mine to add in the percentages obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #14
Pffft. Facts don't matter when there's an agenda to be pushed REP Feb 2012 #16
I'm not flush, but if it's going to PP? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #28
They are counting each refill of a birth control prescription as Zebedeo Feb 2012 #21
I'm not defensive at all obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #23
332,000 per year - "that isn't alot of abortions." Zebedeo Feb 2012 #27
I don't consider any number alot obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #29
If you don't consider any number a lot, Zebedeo Feb 2012 #33
What would you consider "a lot", "a lot" being a totally subjective number? uppityperson Feb 2012 #35
332,278 per year n/t Zebedeo Feb 2012 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Feb 2012 #37
Well, I guess you should push for more abortions so that they are not so few and far between Zebedeo Feb 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Bunny Feb 2012 #50
I like your answer. :) Spock_is_Skeptical Feb 2012 #134
Best answer ever Irishonly Feb 2012 #161
I'd think the relevant and honest way of stating it would be LanternWaste Feb 2012 #63
And what number would be acceptable to you? Gold Metal Flake Feb 2012 #38
Too few, actually. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #39
Wow -- that's alot of unborn possible babies obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #43
They must do them all to cover their abortion stats. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #45
I bet each testicle counts as one instance obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #47
How about 1,211,500 - the number of ALL abortions performed in the US in 2008? REP Feb 2012 #72
I think that's tragic Zebedeo Feb 2012 #85
Why? REP Feb 2012 #89
Because abortion Zebedeo Feb 2012 #93
Actually, abortion does not have negative emotional sequelae REP Feb 2012 #96
Thank you for posting all that. uppityperson Feb 2012 #121
I imagine that a back alley abortion causes emotional and physical trauma. In fact, sometimes death. yardwork Feb 2012 #127
You are correct. That is addressed in this study: REP Feb 2012 #138
and the adverse effects would be a lot less if they weren't constantly hounded by it. grantcart Feb 2012 #147
Except peer-reviewed studies show that isn't true obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #106
Where'd you get that information about the experience of the "baby's" mother and father? yardwork Feb 2012 #126
it depends on how you intend to decrease the number of abortions magical thyme Feb 2012 #157
Why is it tragic and heartbreaking? obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #104
Are you going to support all Carolina Feb 2012 #160
Not all abortions involve a live fetus or "healthy birth" - but all abortions involve a live mother. haele Feb 2012 #76
Thoughtful post, but you conflate two different issues Zebedeo Feb 2012 #86
Two tenths of one percent of women got abortions last year a simple pattern Feb 2012 #103
nonsequitur Zebedeo Feb 2012 #109
They don't exist for you people after they're born, do they? a simple pattern Feb 2012 #117
No. You said 332,278 per year was "a lot", not 'not "very few"'. If you are going to claim you said uppityperson Feb 2012 #122
Actually, they aren't different issues. haele Feb 2012 #135
How many uteruses do you have? I'm betting the number is zero, or maybe one. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #53
YOU GO, WARREN!!! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #54
Thank you. Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #56
Jury is back Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #57
hey juror #2: MY opinion is that it's the woman's decision, period. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #60
Also, without getting too much into meta territory, this highlights one of the problems with Juries Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #66
Exactly n/t obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #67
That experience was educational; up to now, I thought you were notified if a post was alerted on. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #78
I did not "advocate an anti-choice agenda." I merely corrected an erroneous claim Zebedeo Feb 2012 #87
Out of 1,211,500 total abortions in the US (2008) - Planned Parenthood doesn't perform even half REP Feb 2012 #91
Well, it's not "very few." That was a whopper of a statement. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #94
Quibble over your notion if a quarter is a very few or not. REP Feb 2012 #97
What do you think of Skinner's initiative here? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #99
irrelevant Zebedeo Feb 2012 #110
I also just contributed $25 to Planned Parenthood. Because of you and you alone. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #112
No shit. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #118
Yeah! Let's contribute, man! For Zebedeo! Hallelujah! Praise the FSM and Dawkins who is His prophet! 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #120
What do you think of it? Not in relation to this thread. uppityperson Feb 2012 #123
Nope, my claim was true -- 3% keeps staring you in the face obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #107
Right. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #116
In old DU, your post would probably have been deleted. This is a much better outcome. yardwork Feb 2012 #129
BTW, I am not the one Zebedeo Feb 2012 #140
Well, that's rather rude. But I have a thick skin and am willing to forgive and forget. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #90
If someone finds a gun has become dependent upon their body to survive... REP Feb 2012 #92
Rudeness 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #113
I don't care if you think it's "rude". I'm sick as fuck of fucking anti-choicers. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #115
You didn't answer the question about women who have had hysterectomies. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #128
The MAJOR thing you are forgetting is that making abortion illegal will NOT prevent abortions. FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #132
Okay. To start, "Opinion" can mean several different things. Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #142
You answered two questions Zebedeo Feb 2012 #143
Here's a question for you.... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #145
You're not listening to me. But OK; I'll let you define the terms of the debate and ..wait, what? Warren DeMontague Feb 2012 #166
Oh my obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #130
...DINGDINGDINGDINGDING!!! We have a winner Spock_is_Skeptical Feb 2012 #137
We have a winner, folks! proud2BlibKansan Feb 2012 #100
Oh damn a simple pattern Feb 2012 #105
I gotta agree with you there, Warren. MADem Feb 2012 #146
Way to go! Irishonly Feb 2012 #162
Are you going to lecture us about the "holocaust of the unborn" now, too? PVnRT Feb 2012 #58
IMO Mr Dixon Feb 2012 #64
You are 100% right obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #68
Document or retract. REP Feb 2012 #71
No documentation of this spurious claim. Not surprised at all. REP Feb 2012 #98
Where did you get that information from? Link please. Thank you for showing it's not just made up uppityperson Feb 2012 #124
I Googled and found out where that info came from obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #131
Probably wouldn't. "tragic and heartbreaking" indeed. uppityperson Feb 2012 #133
Each refill of a birth control prescription prevents an unwanted pregnancy. yardwork Feb 2012 #125
Of course I do. Zebedeo Feb 2012 #139
This is 100% not true, and you haven't documented it as asked obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #151
"This is done for PR purposes in order to make the organization less controversial." Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #153
You don't seem to care about preventing pregnancies. Maybe you're against birth control? yardwork Feb 2012 #154
+1000 librechik Feb 2012 #31
That's about 15% of its 2009-2010 budget. Sgent Feb 2012 #15
A very small % of what they do, but shows how important they are to women. MH1 Feb 2012 #17
Of course Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider. Gormy Cuss Feb 2012 #52
Thank you, Gormy, I was obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #55
Do you think abortion should be legal? 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #81
Three percent (3%) of all Planned Parenthood services are abortions ellie Feb 2012 #136
I have been informed this poster is no longer with us obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #164
It isn't even all about abortion. It's that notion of PLANNED parenthood MH1 Feb 2012 #18
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #7
More information on Karen Handel, Komen's new VP of Public Policy ehrnst Feb 2012 #8
So apparently lesbian women don't get breast cancer KamaAina Feb 2012 #49
And no post menopausal women get breast cancer either sarge43 Feb 2012 #149
This news saddens me Harmony Blue Feb 2012 #25
K & R Scurrilous Feb 2012 #32
Hey Erick Erickson, you are a fucking idiot. NOTE: Erik is the RW quoted in OP, NOT the OP. uppityperson Feb 2012 #34
+1... SidDithers Feb 2012 #42
Since that post was hidden due to reading comprehension issues on the part of the jurors kath Feb 2012 #141
+1 for this and for blogslut's hidden post. Bolo Boffin Feb 2012 #73
Good information! Thank you for letting us know WHERE the pressure came from csziggy Feb 2012 #51
I PLEDGE I will NEVER visit a Susan G. Komen care center or donate to them. librechik Feb 2012 #59
This story is hitting the media and of course the various feminist groups... CBHagman Feb 2012 #61
A facebook friend said PP has had a spike of 26% donations today obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #65
I saw that PP got $400K donated yesterday Bolo Boffin Feb 2012 #74
Wow -- a 250K donantion! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #75
They started pissing me off when they started suing small charities, to be honest. MADem Feb 2012 #148
I know! obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #152
We need a "Planned Parenthood" walk for charity! ThatsMyBarack Feb 2012 #155
There is also another connection here: James O'keefe Raine1967 Feb 2012 #159
Planned Parenthood should go after the SGK foundation's core business. Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #163
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #142