General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The marginalization of "The Left" through the years. Not hearing us now at all. [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Without Wallace, and just 4percent more in California, LBJ easily would have been President.
HHH never stood a chance BECAUSE of Wallace.
Without LBJ Wallace had the south. HHH had nothing in the south to latch onto.
LBJ would have overcome that.
1968 was a fascinating race. Perhaps the most intriguing election and the most
what could have been.
We never had a battle of titans.
Which is what America needs.
2016 will bring forth the titans.
And finally then the battle for the soul of the country, liberal vs. conservative with two who could win will be such.
Hillary/Napolitano vs. Bush/??(Christie?Carson?Portman?Condie?)
With Hillary kicking Bush's rear end to finally ending their presidential runs forever. Three strikes and the Bush's are out.
But never agian a 3rd party. Never Again.
and the war did end, but long time later, and it was from the republicans responsiblity.
LBJ losing gave rise to the Bush family.
So if one doesn't like Bush's, it goes without saying they should have begged LBJ back in the race. He would have beaten Nixon. HHH was an inferior candidate(though a great person, super nice guy, and great views, but he just was a terrible candidate for 1968.
(and he would have been the nominee if Bobby was still around. Bobby's time could have been 1972 and 1976.)