General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Online Bullying – a New and Ugly Sport for Liberal Commenters--The UK Guardian--Oct. 2012 [View all]Kurovski
(34,657 posts)"The thing I never bought about the labeling of statements as "the tone argument" is that most people who mention it ignore the point of debate in this particular context - not just to distinguish fact from falsehood, but also to effect social change.
Obviously the emotion or style with which something is said does not affect its truth-value. But it does affect the penetrative ability of the truths you may be attempting to impart, by discouraging would-be debaters and discrediting yourself to people who might be more amenable to your views.
The only problem with criticizing tone is when it is used as a substitute for criticizing a position - in other words, as an emotional argument rather than as a legitimate critique of a person's willingness to engage in constructive discussion..."