General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US judge prompts outrage after saying: ‘If she didn’t want sex, her body should have just shut down’ [View all]Divernan
(15,480 posts)"The commission noted (PDF) that Gurel, a Turkish citizen, stalked his girlfriend with a GPS device, made a bomb threat against her, faxed a nude photo of her to her workplace, vandalized her vehicle, then threatened to burn her with a heated screwdriver or just set her on fire before repeatedly forcing her to give him fellatio."
"Despite the public admonishment, Judge Johnson remains on the bench."
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/12/14/california-judge-admonished-for-saying-victims-body-should-have-shut-down-rape/
Quoting this obscene excuse for a judge:
He added: That tells me that the victim in this case, although she wasnt necessarily willing, she didnt put up a fight. And to treat this case like the rape cases that we all hear about is an insult to victims of rape. I think its an insult. I think it trivializes a rape. I found this whole case to be a technical case. The rape is technical. The forced oral copulation is technical. Its more of a crim law test than a real live criminal case.