General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: One is either for NRA/LaPierre/Guns, or for Mike Bloomberg/anti-gun side. NO middle ground. [View all]graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Travy has no civil rights left.
It's a shame. He might have cured cancer 10 years from now
again, no one cares if anyone likes him or not. He ain't running for anything.
The vast majority of Americans want the insanity of guns to stop.
Guns are so 1850s. And back in the 1850s there were laws stating NO guns in the streets when one entered a wild west town.
And millions hated Lincoln and LBJ too.
But then I love both.
As long as Bloomberg spends one dollar more, the candidates will change, Hillary will bring in the house and Senate in 2016 and 2020 and the court shall shift
Matters little if Bloomberg is rated 1% or 100%. It is 100% irrelevant.
And nothing will stop the court shift.
And the more Gunpeople hate it, the better the odds that it is going to happen.
Everything else is irrelevant (but a good distraction, that is what LaPierre says in his
daily talking points him and his suits hand out.
BTW, women are going to get it all changed.
52% of the country is women, and women don't in major big numbers like guns.
Long as Joe Biden is running the anti-gun show, every single Obama fan loves Joe.
Therefore Joe and Gabbie are the face.
No one cares about Bloomy. They care about his leading the $$$$ to break the blackmail
of the NRA.
Game
set
match
or as Roy Orbison sang "It's over, it's over, it's over"
and the NRA is over.
edit to add-btw, this will be my last response to you.
No need to respond to those who like the gun situation the way it is.
Still laugh at the way Chuck Heston came off as such an idiot in Michael Moore's "Columbine".
He clung to his guns, he looked totally ridiculous then. Now, he is completely forgotten, as he ruined his acting reputation.
The NRA though is Soylent Green.
totally irrelevant, but watch, the gun porn is going to start.