US judge prompts outrage after saying: ‘If she didn’t want sex, her body should have just shut down’

[caseymoz]

67. You're right, with a few nuances.

First, they probably don't remember where they originally got the idea. If that's the case, how do they know they've been following somebody else's wishes? Maybe they just think that they're willfully concurring with their church's teachings, for instance, and didn't look at the implications then. By the time they reach full adulthood, it looks normal.

But then there's the people who take the ideas and make them their own. Pope Pius. A Pope who leads other people has taken time analyzing it.

If he thinks on the subject, and doesn't find the mistake, if he's actually coming up with new reasons and arguments to be contemptuous toward women, who, say, didn't want to die resisting rape, that can only be described as hellbent. Because he's adding his own fantasies to it. That requires some kind of emotional impetus.

He deserves contempt and no sympathy about it. Off topic, but he also aided the rise of Nazism and awarded fascists like Franco and Salazar medals. Not a good person.

This judge, if what happened to Aikin did not make him re-exam thinking, he deserves to be disbarred. I mean, he's a judge. His work is intellectual. He shouldn't be in place of authority.

Unfortunately, almost any follower can become a leader sometime.