Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,187 posts)
18. gender-neutral doesn't cover the concerns and benefits of a woman chair, expressed in the letter
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 01:02 PM
Mar 2013

"There has never been a female chair of the Federal Communications Commission and a woman chair would go far to making women more visible and powerful in the media and technology.

As we step into 2013, women are still underrepresented in the leadership of America's media and its technology industries. Women hold only 6 percent of all TV and radio station licenses and under one-third of TV news directors are women. Of top executives working for technology companies just over 5 percent are women. Media companies have some of the most powerful resources at their disposal in shaping attitudes and culture. And as the Internet transforms American media and telecommunications, it has become central to the nation’s competitiveness as well as the future of culture, news, and communication."


I think these points raised are worthy and fair considerations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Be careful what you ask for - Obama is perfectly capable of appointing Carly Fiorina...... djean111 Mar 2013 #1
+1 Jamaal510 Mar 2013 #14
gender-neutral doesn't cover the concerns and benefits of a woman chair, expressed in the letter bigtree Mar 2013 #18
he'll nominate whoever he believes in bigtree Mar 2013 #17
gender should not be a consideration. bowens43 Mar 2013 #2
Affirmative Action demwing Mar 2013 #6
Because it's still not a level playing field. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #9
it shouldn't be assumed that the woman nominated wouldn't share the President's goals bigtree Mar 2013 #16
Exactly. theKed Mar 2013 #19
I nominate Gloria Leonard. bluedigger Mar 2013 #3
Grammar quibble--they're calling for him to appoint a woman, not a female. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #4
"Female" can be used as an adjective OR a noun demwing Mar 2013 #8
The press release said woman, not female. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #10
That was not your original point demwing Mar 2013 #12
the letter referenced both 'female' and 'woman' chair in the same sentence bigtree Mar 2013 #13
Waste of time. Man or woman LittleBlue Mar 2013 #5
They weren't asking Obama to become a liberal, UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #11
"Don't celebrate a woman getting the position" - Sorry, but I will demwing Mar 2013 #22
Good for you LittleBlue Mar 2013 #26
Good for you demwing Mar 2013 #27
The nominee should be firmly in favor of net neutrality. nt Generation_Why Mar 2013 #7
As a woman, I have no more use for female corporate shills than I do for male ones. forestpath Mar 2013 #15
Exactly. djean111 Mar 2013 #20
It wouldn't surprise me a bit if he chose her, or somebody just as bad. forestpath Mar 2013 #21
Why? demwing Mar 2013 #23
I don't have to explain myself to you. forestpath Mar 2013 #24
I'm sorry, you apparently didn't get the memo demwing Mar 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gloria Steinem and Friend...»Reply #18