Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Labor Attorneys Agree: The Adria Richards Firing Will Be Hard to Defend [View all]Recursion
(56,582 posts)39. What "management"? They didn't work together
She tweeted the picture so the event staff could tell who she was talking about
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
252 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Labor Attorneys Agree: The Adria Richards Firing Will Be Hard to Defend [View all]
Recursion
Mar 2013
OP
The statement was that her job as a "developer evangelist" was to communicate well with developers
Recursion
Mar 2013
#2
It's funny to watch how "Anonymous" ping-pongs back & forth between brave anti-establishment heroes
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#223
Well, she is apparently good at her actual job, but as that article points out, she alienates
sabrina 1
Mar 2013
#65
that could be a bullshit blog with a person with an ax. we do not know anything and her we are
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#180
who is amanda blum that met (or saw) her once and has issue with the one other time she spoke out?
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#173
a woman that had a job and supposedly a good reputation in that job, that called out sexist behavior
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#206
Digging Beneath the Surface: That Amanda Blum Article on Adria Richards is Not What It Seems
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#230
Digging Beneath the Surface: That Amanda Blum Article on Adria Richards is Not What It Seems
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#229
glad to see you backed away from amandas article further damaging richards professional career.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#234
if you backed away from nothing sabrina, it really bottomline, says it all. nt
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#241
yeah, i'm not clear how the "public shaming was completely within bounds" conclusion was reached.
unblock
Mar 2013
#13
Did they deserve to be fired? These 2 people were at a conference talking to each other. They were
Pisces
Mar 2013
#138
True, but were the jokes in question so offensive that the public demanded they be fired? In my
Pisces
Mar 2013
#144
When people in your indsutry are scared to work with you, you won't get much work accomplished
Malik Agar
Mar 2013
#7
Thanks for Posting - I Wondered if Richards Might be a "Difficult" Person to Work W/
dballance
Mar 2013
#31
who is amanda blum? one article on a blog made specifically to vilify the woman.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#174
not like you ever reply to what i actually post. who the hell is amanda blum and why should
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#179
Digging Beneath the Surface: That Amanda Blum Article on Adria Richards is Not What It Seems
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#231
i don't know the timing, but it would have been more defensible if they actually lost business first
unblock
Mar 2013
#15
As long as my co-workers are efficient at their job and maintain professionalism
LanternWaste
Apr 2013
#252
This assumes the collective forgets this poster child. I suspect they will not. n/t
Demo_Chris
Mar 2013
#77
+1 Ridicule was a higher priority than a solution. Such people ARE hard to work with. nt
patrice
Mar 2013
#32
It didn't need not to be, either. You don't have some bizarre "right" to have people...
Recursion
Mar 2013
#49
I guess public shaming is in vogue. No one should have their privacy invaded by having their picture
Pisces
Mar 2013
#147
Women who have less tolerance for beavis and butthead are "little miss prisses" and "drama queens"?
redqueen
Mar 2013
#56
This is not about tech. People across the spectrum, men and women love to tell a dirty joke. Are we
Pisces
Mar 2013
#242
No. "Engineer Evangelists" who so lack discretion or think they are so important
magical thyme
Mar 2013
#58
Right. You call them "Little Miss Priss drama queens" because of the method they choose
redqueen
Mar 2013
#64
That's reporting it, complaining about you don't have to and BOTH are protected under the law whethe
uponit7771
Mar 2013
#72
In my day, kids fought. Nobody insisted that we "play nice with each other" or "use our words".
ZOB
Mar 2013
#28
Some of AR's defenders should ask themselves what their reaction would be if sex roles in this
patrice
Mar 2013
#33
As I said, tweeting it is shouting from the mountaintops, through a megaphone, or whatever metaphor
jeff47
Mar 2013
#165
she called out the sexist crap. against convention policy and the man company policy.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#176
lmfao.. ya, cause telling a man that is throwing out sexist crap in an environment he KNOWs
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#186
So she's just a child, being crushed by evil, evil men every day at her work?
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#207
what? if i told racist jokes? against company policy? and i was called out? i would expect my ass
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#175
I don't know how other people handle it, but where I work taking an work issue to thousands...
JVS
Mar 2013
#34
When you make a bad hiring decision, you have to fix it as soon as it becomes evident.
FarCenter
Mar 2013
#118
In general accusations of the kind you just made say more about the accuser than the accused
Demo_Chris
Mar 2013
#92
All parties involved handled this poorly. No one should have been fired and she should not have
Pisces
Mar 2013
#129
and how often do men knock off their sexist bullshit when a woman says... knock it off?
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#178
I worked in a male dominated field and they will knock it off if you tell them to directly and with
Pisces
Mar 2013
#188
if you look at the picture, she is a great enough distance there was no personal whispering of the
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#189
They were one row behind her. I have been to conferences before and that is not a great distance.
Pisces
Mar 2013
#190
they were behind, to the side. it is not her job to give them the "opportunity" to behave properly
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#191
I don't disagree that the tech industry has a bad rep. She was not on her job. These are not her
Pisces
Mar 2013
#192
creating a hostile work environment is seldom so direct as to be speaking to the woman. sexists
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#205
And if a female made the joke, and it made people uncomfortable, it would also be harassment
Recursion
Mar 2013
#216
It was not on the job. It was at a conference, not her co-workers, not directed at her or about her.
Pisces
Mar 2013
#228
JOAN OF ARC OF THE DONGLES will come out of this just fine, I'm sure.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#145
and the fact that she got death threats, of course, justifies her making a giant stink
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#212
so now you're in favor of posting peoples' pictures on the internet without their consent?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#218
geez, you do not get it, but knew you were trippin to say this line. GIANT STINK.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#219
she posted their picture without their consent. Apparently you're okay with that sort of thing.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#220
it is a waste of time to even begin to educate you. hence, me focusing on the giant stink,
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#221
Ahh!!! I spent 15 minutes typing that, on my phone no less and all I get is one sentence??
opiate69
Mar 2013
#237