General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OK. About the Georgia murder of the toddler. [View all]DevonRex
(22,541 posts)and reported anonymously. That kid eventually gave the name of a second kid they arrested. He denies everything.
Now to what bothers me. How did the first kid leave in a car when they were on foot together and why didn't the other one get in the car too? The little one was seen but the big one wasn't? Doesn't make sense. I know how easy it is to get a child to say what you want him to say. Name a 17-y-o and you can go home. It'll all be over. And the kid finally does it so he can go home to his mom. Pretend it never happened.
All this hinges on procedure. I don't know what procedures were followed. Who was with the youngster when the police talked to him? They can sound so soothing and kind. We just want to ask some questions because someone saw him near the scene. So he just needs to tell us what he saw. We know he didn't shoot anybody.
That would sound OK to the child and the parent, right? No need for an attorney. Maybe the parent didn't even go in the room. Sometimes they'll tell a parent that the kid might not be comfortable talking about certain things in front of them. Parents know how that is so they agree. Wrong thing to do.
And look, I know this from both sides. They want to solve it. Most cops are good people and don't cross the line. But some do. Some can take that scenario above and then get the kid to say things that are not true just because he wants to go home. Most will not. Some are too ambitious about their careers. Want to increase their solved case numbers, especially when it's a high visibility case.