Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(98,883 posts)

7. The answer should have your part about equal protection under the law. Adding the heterosexual part

Tue Mar 26, 2013, 05:18 PM

Mar 2013

Would just just confirm the racist Scalia's belief that marriage is not a constitutional right

Equal protection under the law says everything

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What I WISH Ted Olson had said to Justice [sic] Scalia . . . [View all] markpkessinger Mar 2013 OP

(Ahem!) ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2013 #1

Perhaps it's "sic justice scalia," as in "sic semper tyrannis" Glorfindel Mar 2013 #3

"Thus, always to tyrants" Bucky Mar 2013 #5

Yeah -- it does seem like that question should have been anticipated n/t markpkessinger Mar 2013 #6