Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
98. You mean my first hand story
Tue Mar 26, 2013, 08:42 PM
Mar 2013

From an actual mail handler

Here is the USPS mailing requirements. This time the whole page.


Careful preparation of your package helps to ensure safe delivery.


Preparing packages


The Box
Choose a box with enough room for cushioning material around the contents. Sturdy paperboard or corrugated fiberboard boxes are best for weights up to 10 pounds. If you are reusing a box, totally remove or obliterate all previous labels and markings with heavy black marker.

Where to Find Boxes
You can purchase boxes and tubes of various sizes at most Post Offices. Express Mail and Priority Mail boxes are available free at the Post Office for items sent using either of these services. While you are not required to use the free packaging for these services, you must use the USPS-produced address label provided by the Post Office for Express Mail. To order Express Mail or Priority Mail boxes at no extra charge, call 1·800·222·1811 or visit www.usps.com and click on Shop.

Cushioning
Place the cushioning all around your item or items. You can use newspaper, “foam peanuts,” or shredded paper. Close and shake the box to see if you have enough cushioning. If you hear items shifting, add more cushioning.

Placing an extra address label with the delivery and return addresses inside the package will ensure that the item can be delivered in case the outside label becomes damaged or falls off.

Mailing Fragile Items
Use foamed plastic or padding to protect your items, placing the cushioning inside hollow items as well. Mark the package “Fragile” or mark “Perishable” on packages that contain food or other items that can spoil. Careful packaging is the best way to safeguard your valuable items against damage.

Mailing Heavy Items
If you are mailing a very heavy or very dense item, start with a sturdy box, pack the contents securely with a strong material for bracing to prevent shifting, and tape all the edges with reinforced tape. Packages heavier than 70 pounds cannot be mailed.

Sealing
Tape the opening of your box and reinforce all seams with 2-inch-wide tape. Use clear or brown packaging tape, reinforced packing tape, or paper tape. Do not use cord, string, twine, masking or cellophane tape. Place a strip of clear packaging tape over your label to prevent the address from smearing.

Return Address
Print or type your address in the upper left corner on the same side of the package as the delivery address.

Extra Services
Place labels for extra services above the delivery address and to the right of the return address, or to the left of the delivery address.

Postage
Use stamps, a postage meter, or a PC Postage system to affix the correct amount. You can calculate and purchase postage online at www.usps.com.

Delivery Address
Print or type the delivery address parallel to the longest side of the package. Type or print clearly with a pen so that your address is legible from an arm’s length away. Do not use commas or periods.

Confirmation Services
Labels for Delivery Confirmation or Signature Confirmation are placed to the left of the address label.

City, State, and ZIP Code
To find the correct spelling of a city name and state abbreviation or to find a ZIP Code, visit www.usps.com or call 1·800·ASK·USPS. Using the correct ZIP Code helps direct your mail more efficiently and accurately.

Drop Off
If your mail item weighs 13 ounces or less, and you have affixed correct postage, you can drop it into a blue collection box. If your item weighs more than 13 ounces, and you have affixed postage stamps, you must take it to an employee at the retail counter of a Post Office.

http://pe.usps.com/text/dmm100/preparing-packages.htm


Now you explain how affixing tape that is not clear or brown meets USPS regulations.

Yup, confirmation bias, on steroids.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I doubt it nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #1
Didnt you know that the Post Office is funding HARP to target Atheist Shoemakers???? Come on!! Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #8
That explains the nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #13
Exactly! Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #14
Got any evidence? backscatter712 Mar 2013 #58
Correction: The Atheist Shoe Illuminati! Katashi_itto Mar 2013 #59
Lemme see, ship them through the Postal System in Berlin nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #60
You saw post #15, or the same illustration in the link in the OP, correct? backscatter712 Mar 2013 #61
Yes, I read it nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #62
The evidence shows that mail marked "ATHEIST" gets handled differently than normal mail. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #69
because the autimated system nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #71
Interesting hypothesis. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #80
So you think postal workers are doing it on purpoise nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #82
I don't think it's most postal/DHL workers - it'd likely a small subset of felonious bad apples. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #119
How about DHL? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #121
The company lied nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #123
If postal workers are involved s with last mile nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #124
Here is one better nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #117
You'd have a point, except that they sent "plain wrap" packages to the same people jeff47 Mar 2013 #51
The shoes are being sent to younger people, identifying the product, against USPS rules. TheBlackAdder Mar 2013 #83
They are getting delayed due to not following packaging nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #84
because apparently the most obvious explaination.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #94
Well this is what we call bias confirmation nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #95
no this is what *you* are calling 'bias confirmation', not *we* Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #96
You mean my first hand story nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #98
that's not how '1st' vs '2nd' hand works. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #100
No son, he is what historians consider a primary source nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #102
I would roll my eyes at a package covered with 'Atheist' just much as 'Christian.' onehandle Mar 2013 #2
And the automated processing machine nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #68
Neither would sound preachy to me. ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #140
I don't know if it's bias, but kudzu22 Mar 2013 #3
The neutral package met USPS shipping regulations nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #108
Aha -- perhaps the culprit has been revealed kudzu22 Mar 2013 #111
You welcome nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #113
More to the culprit nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #118
Gee, I wonder what would happen if they used RoccoR5955 Mar 2013 #4
So they wouldn't get into copyright issues LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #7
The machine would kick it out as well nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #90
There needs to be an investigation as to who is doing the delaying LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #5
Yes - clearly, some fundies are letting their religious beliefs interfere with their jobs. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #28
I doubt it My Good Babushka Mar 2013 #6
When humans are involved it can happen. LiberalFighter Mar 2013 #9
All those shoes are going to the same place My Good Babushka Mar 2013 #22
Mebbe company is not following USPS shipping guidelines nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #103
Is the "not following" part WinniSkipper Mar 2013 #141
See post #15. n/t backscatter712 Mar 2013 #27
I have no idea how often packages from other German companies go missing My Good Babushka Mar 2013 #33
The study here presented a control. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #37
Three days. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #85
Thank you, I have a small craft business that does lots of shipping My Good Babushka Mar 2013 #132
And add insult to injury nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #134
This atheist needs a little more proof before he'll have faith in the assertion. nt Poll_Blind Mar 2013 #10
The link does show an actual experiment being conducted. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #25
He of little faith...you were correct. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #125
Unrec for pointless speculation: "we started to wonder if" FSogol Mar 2013 #11
Oh, like good atheists they performed a carefully conducted experiment after they wondered Fumesucker Mar 2013 #15
Carefully Constructed Experiement would have included tape that said SOMETHING inoffensive AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #142
I think customs is the problem. RebelOne Mar 2013 #19
And it is DHL that does the shipping per their own site nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #127
I didn't realize shoes could have a religious preference. Fawke Em Mar 2013 #12
this is most interesting niyad Mar 2013 #16
Save The Atheist Shoes!!!11! MineralMan Mar 2013 #17
How about having a government agency treat everyone equally. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #29
Actually, I'd be more interested in seeing if there was truly MineralMan Mar 2013 #35
The study in the OP show numbers comparing ATHEIST-marked packages with unmarked packages. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #46
due to the automated Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #76
WOW. Packages mailed internationally taking a long time to get there? Nye Bevan Mar 2013 #18
FFS, try reading more than the headline. jeff47 Mar 2013 #53
GET REAL olddots Mar 2013 #20
Using atheist packaging tape is "shoving it down people's throats"? Apophis Mar 2013 #23
Using DHL and blaming USPS is kind of funny nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #128
You just "shoved it down people's throats" more than a strip of tape on a package. jeff47 Mar 2013 #54
must have hit home olddots Mar 2013 #66
It's not bias, the US postal service really sucks when it comes to international packages. JVS Mar 2013 #21
You did read the part where packages with atheist tape Apophis Mar 2013 #24
See post #15. n/t backscatter712 Mar 2013 #26
But given the abominably slow nature of the postal service's handling of international packages is.. JVS Mar 2013 #32
Is the fact that ATHEIST-marked packages were ten times more likely to be lost significant? n/t backscatter712 Mar 2013 #38
Yes. They did the math. So's the 10x higher loss rate. (nt) jeff47 Mar 2013 #55
See the bottom of the illustration in post #15. p<.01. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #56
And it is really, the slow point, US Customs. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #63
They use DHL by the by nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #129
But are the shoes any good? OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #30
They'd better, for the price 129.00 euros nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #91
Yep... OriginalGeek Mar 2013 #109
The real question is: Do they have soles? nt mathematic Mar 2013 #31
Atheist shoes got no soles. MineralMan Mar 2013 #36
Oh, Thank God! (so to speak)... JHB Mar 2013 #39
I'm curious as to whether the tape itself might be the problem. surrealAmerican Mar 2013 #34
Maybe there should be a third group in this experiment. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #40
The 4th group would probably be prone to being blown up in controlled explosions (nt) muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #72
Yes, but not exactly the reason you suggest. nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #74
so your 2nd hand anecdotal 'evidence' is.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #92
You mean my first hand nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #97
doesn't change the *fact* that your 2nd hand evidence.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #99
So riddle me this batman nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #101
cutting to the chase here.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #104
To sum up nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #105
Look at the "study" again. hay rick Mar 2013 #106
Gets better nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #120
Look what I just found nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #116
I think you've adequately explained the delay. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #144
Looks like the "controlled study" missed accouting for one variable kudzu22 Mar 2013 #112
And what of the missing packages? AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #143
One cannot create a good statistical analysis from such a small sample size. NCTraveler Mar 2013 #41
I've seen studies with this kind of size that show statistical significance. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #44
Scratch that, the atheist folks from Berlin DID run a statistical analysis. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #47
wow the attempts to weasel out of statistical analysis here are telling. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #42
The unspoken message I'm getting here is: backscatter712 Mar 2013 #43
right.. Phillip McCleod Mar 2013 #45
Just barely unspoken DavidDvorkin Mar 2013 #49
Riggghhhttt nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #75
That's the message I'm seeing. Apophis Mar 2013 #110
Indeed. DavidDvorkin Mar 2013 #48
And I just posted the fine print at the bottom of that illustration. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #50
Numbers don't lie, but the interpretation of them often does kudzu22 Mar 2013 #114
What if I told you they use DHL not USPS? nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #136
Not any real surprise to me. Rex Mar 2013 #52
Wish I were surprised temporary311 Mar 2013 #57
Not the USPS. But if each package goes through a dozen different hands? ieoeja Mar 2013 #64
Oh and here is more nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #65
Isn't there some way to trace or track the packages? Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #67
An answer that is away from victim mode nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #73
I want my conspiracy theory back. hay rick Mar 2013 #79
I just posted as much nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #81
Evidently Amazon dot com is not aware of this problem with the USPS machines.. Fumesucker Mar 2013 #131
A few points. hay rick Mar 2013 #135
And then I found the truth nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #126
WHO IS THIS SENDER AND WHAT IS HE DOING WITH OTHER PEOPLE'S MAIL?!?!?!? Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 #70
If the mail scanning machines automatically kick out packages with printed tapes djean111 Mar 2013 #77
They do nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #78
I'd like to point out that this was apparently part of an ad campaign... Marr Mar 2013 #86
Hubby had another theory nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #87
Could be. It'd be a bit hypocritical of me Marr Mar 2013 #88
I happen to be married to one of the workers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #89
This "study" was very graphics-intensive. hay rick Mar 2013 #93
So, they think the overworked and harried package sorters have special corner for "atheist" stuff? bhikkhu Mar 2013 #107
I suspect all the worker has to do is put the package that offends him in the wrong bin. backscatter712 Mar 2013 #122
There is more... nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #115
poor controls. poor study. eom yawnmaster Mar 2013 #130
And they ship through DHL nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #133
Looking at the link, I do believe this is mainly for publicity... yawnmaster Mar 2013 #138
Not really, they had this "study" posted, nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #139
oh! sure yah! them postal employees is got nothin on their mind cept whether th'sender struggle4progress Mar 2013 #137
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the US Postal Service ...»Reply #98