Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You could be right - your prediction is not unreasonable - The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2013 #1
I made a similar comment in another thread - Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #4
Wise words. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #5
My take as a straight white male is that the supremes will do as little as possible. OffWithTheirHeads Mar 2013 #2
Because the rule is DON'T decide matters and cases which do not HAVE to be decided, elleng Mar 2013 #3
Yes, this. RudynJack Mar 2013 #8
Could be; elleng Mar 2013 #9
"Makes Gov. Dean's new venture more important." David Zephyr Mar 2013 #13
elleng, you're a treasure to this board Richardo Mar 2013 #47
Oh dear Richardo, thank you. elleng Mar 2013 #48
At least 6 to 3 to rule gay marriage flat out Constitutional Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2013 #6
Unfortunately, that isn't how constitutional law works. Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #10
Hmm. Question: Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2013 #12
No, not after Loving v. Virginia. elleng Mar 2013 #14
I have always loved that quote by Justice Stewart. DevonRex Mar 2013 #27
That is how it started out (it was a recognition across state boundaries issue) Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #16
OK, between you and elleng I am thoroughly confused Benton D Struckcheon Mar 2013 #18
elleng likely has a better summary of Loving Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #25
Cases based on sexual orientation are decided by applying the rational JDPriestly Mar 2013 #30
It is an interesting question Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #38
Right to the point. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #19
Oh, but that it was so easy...and fair...and just. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #20
Scalia, from a legal perspective, Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #7
Fascinating. Thanks for the insight, Ms. Toad Hekate Mar 2013 #17
From a human perspective, the view is a lot different. Moostache Mar 2013 #23
Scalia. Whenever he talks or writes at great length it is always bullshit. DevonRex Mar 2013 #28
True. I remember one opinion he wrote in which he avoided JDPriestly Mar 2013 #31
Have you spent much time reading his criminal law opinions? Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #39
From a biological stand point davidpdx Mar 2013 #40
You may be right about that one! n/t Ms. Toad Mar 2013 #41
Hi David! MuseRider Mar 2013 #11
Hearty hello and hug to you, MuseRider. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #21
Oh gosh David me too MuseRider Mar 2013 #42
Thank you for lending us your trained ear Hekate Mar 2013 #15
Remember. Roberts adopted his two children because he and his JDPriestly Mar 2013 #32
Thank you. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #49
As I think back, I believe that my first violin teacher was probably a JDPriestly Mar 2013 #50
Guess what? I agree with you. "Not a defeat, by any means." David Zephyr Mar 2013 #34
I am hoping for the best but, like you, I think they will not go all the way. nm rhett o rick Mar 2013 #22
I'll take the narrow ruling on this one. Let's hope for a better day tomorrow with DOMA. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #37
Maybe Why This Is So Hard Here colsohlibgal Mar 2013 #24
Actually, the problem here is not with the Puritans who settled in New JDPriestly Mar 2013 #33
"the U.S. got the Puritans". It's so funny and painfully true at the same time. David Zephyr Mar 2013 #35
The Prop 8 case gives the court an easy out. RandySF Mar 2013 #26
Wouldn't that invite more cases from more states? n/t moondust Mar 2013 #29
They will refuse to decide ArcticFox Mar 2013 #36
They just keep fighting to keep those blinders on! WinstonSmith4740 Mar 2013 #43
That's what I was thinking! rusty fender Mar 2013 #45
That would be an Insane Ruling Demeter Mar 2013 #44
Is it dusty in here or what? displacedtexan Mar 2013 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposition 8: What I hea...»Reply #35