General Discussion

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)

29. Great post, Egalitarian Thug.

Reply to Egalitarian Thug (Reply #28)

Wed Mar 27, 2013, 06:59 AM

Mar 2013

Bravo!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why Noam Chomsky Is the Subject of Relentless Attacks by Corporate Media and Establishment [View all] Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 OP

Lovely defense of Chomsky and good to hear that Greenwald is working on a new book... Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #1

Yes, very good defense ... Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #2

I've seen attacks on those two right here on DU. Cleita Mar 2013 #3

I have as well. RedCappedBandit Mar 2013 #5

DU and the Democratic Party have plenty of conservatives. They call themselves Democrats rhett o rick Mar 2013 #6

That's the problem with conflating a political party with philosophy. The republican party was the Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #28

Great post, Egalitarian Thug. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #29

TYVM. It is appreciated. n/t Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #44

I second the "great post". I wish I could bookmark a post. rhett o rick Mar 2013 #32

YVW as well, and you can. Select the OP, click on the reply you wish to bookmark, then bookmark as Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #47

Good idea. Thanks. nm rhett o rick Mar 2013 #49

well put Puzzledtraveller Mar 2013 #39

TYVM. Egalitarian Thug Mar 2013 #48

I can kind of sort of see people attacking Chomsky here on DU (and have) ... Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #7

There are some who think he's not unbiased enough. Cleita Mar 2013 #9

For the love of fuck. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #10

It is almost impossible to be "unbiased". Especially history, which IMO is heavily biased one way rhett o rick Mar 2013 #30

he's been known to tell the truth about the obama administration... KG Mar 2013 #19

Party fealty is for the brain-dead. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #21

I believe that we all have different levels of denial we use to maintain our sanity. rhett o rick Mar 2013 #31

K&R, Excellent Thread! smirkymonkey Mar 2013 #4

Do any paleoconservatives still throw out "chomskyite" as an insult? Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #8

Really? RudynJack Mar 2013 #11

I found a lecture on Netflix, and the sound was so low Kurovski Mar 2013 #13

It's Alternet's headline. The original from The Guardian is titled, "How Noam Chomsky is Discussed" Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #14

Oh, I didn't realize that AlterNet took liberties with the title. Fantastic Anarchist Mar 2013 #15

Author's rarely write their own titles... Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #20

K&R. (nt) Kurovski Mar 2013 #12

I nominate this for post of the day! limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #16

Seconded. woo me with science Mar 2013 #18

K&R woo me with science Mar 2013 #17

He's not really attacked, he's ignored. Which in his field is even worse. JaneyVee Mar 2013 #22

They are attacked by "the establishment" because they speak Truth to Power... ReRe Mar 2013 #23

You are confusing the Watergate break in with Ellsberg shrink's attempted Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #25

There were two break-ins at the Watergate Bldg? ReRe Mar 2013 #26

Are you referring to this part. "Nixon White House officials sought to steal the files from Daniel rhett o rick Mar 2013 #33

Yes. Daniel Ellssberg's Psychiatrist's... ReRe Mar 2013 #35

I am confused as to why you are discussing the Watergate breakin. Did Greenwald mention Watergate?nm rhett o rick Mar 2013 #40

It's me.... ReRe Mar 2013 #41

No problem. We are all friends here. Well most of us. Well a couple of us. rhett o rick Mar 2013 #42

You practice.... ReRe Mar 2013 #45

Kick. Luminous Animal Mar 2013 #24

Kicking. love_katz Mar 2013 #27

K&R idwiyo Mar 2013 #34

The people who attack Chomsky are not the people whom Chomsky is addressing. bemildred Mar 2013 #36

Recommend KoKo Mar 2013 #37

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Mar 2013 #38

kick rhett o rick Mar 2013 #43

to read later snagglepuss Mar 2013 #46