How Karl Rove fixed the FBI investigation of his theft of the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio

[Cliff Arnebeck]

126. The critical importance of deposing Karl Rove

Last edited Wed Mar 27, 2013, 08:06 PM - Edit history (1)

Rove and his very fine counsel understand the importance to us--to any case that would shut the serial vote rigging down--of getting Rove to testify under oath. When we successfully served Rove with a deposition subpoena in October 2010, Bob Luskin filed a hundred or so pages in support of his motion to quash. This included an affidavit of Karl Rove saying he never worked in Ohio on any elections, plus some questions we might ask him might violate executive privilege that applied in 2004 when he served in the White House.

Rove can lie and subject himself to perjury charges. Rove can take the Fifth, from which adverse inferences can be drawn by a jury in a civil RICO case. Or, he can come clean and redeem himself for the sake of democracy and civilization.

The most incredible thing to me is that, with two criminal investigations of Rove by special prosecutors under President Bush and a U.S. House Judiciary subpoena, Rove has never been asked under oath about his naughty habit of red shifting votes, even to the point of stealing two Presidential elections. And, by the way, Mr. Rove, "Did you steal votes across the board in the 2010 elections to seize control of the reapportionment process and Congressional and state legislative control for the rest of the decade?"