Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Conservatives Do Massive Facepalm Over Romney’s ‘Very Poor’ Gaffe [View all]kemah
(276 posts)37. He Only Speaks the Truth
The GOP really do care about poor people, never did, never will. Mitt is only expressing out loud what the GOP base believes in. Show me any program or bill that the GOP has passed or introduced that will help any poor people. NONE
All their agenda is on how to screw over the poor. Cutting regulations, abolishing unions, cutting public education, the list goes on and on. All designed to help the 1% at the expensive of the 99%. They use the poor people's taxes to enrich themselves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
he's providing some really good material for a montage of out-of-touch-rich guy comments
arely staircase
Feb 2012
#5
Romney is going to give Obama too many opportunities to go on the offensive.
Dawson Leery
Feb 2012
#7
I would say this is the true Romney shining through. Ask you're self this question..
wandy
Feb 2012
#44
Awesome moniker . . . three bad Republican politicians in a crap-filled burrito!
HughBeaumont
Feb 2012
#24
Psst, Mitt! That's another one of those things the GOP think is fine to talk about in quiet rooms.
tanyev
Feb 2012
#21
Teh Repuke establishment may be behind Romney, but the rightwing echo machine
joeybee12
Feb 2012
#33
Wait - isn't Mitt supposed to be the "steady as she goes, no drama" candidate?
yellowcanine
Feb 2012
#39