Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. It's sort of
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 02:05 PM
Mar 2013

"I guess I am surprised to find out "Anonymous" was elected to Congress. Do you have any idea who this person might have been? "

...like voice votes and "anonymous" holds. Still, that doesn't change the fact that they knew it was there.

While there are no definite fingerprints for whoever is responsible for the rider, the earmark was allowed under the direction of Senator Barbara Mikulski, the Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee (D-MD). Congress has held no hearings on this controversial biotech rider and many Democrats in the Committee were unaware of its presence in the CR. Additionally, Mikulski and the Senate Appropriations Committee failed to bring this rider in front of the Agriculture or Judiciary Committees, disregarding their expertise and jurisdiction and in blatant violation of common practice.

<...>

CFS applauds Senator Tester and his co-sponsors Senators Boxer, Gillibrand, Leahy, Begich and Blumenthal for their efforts to pass an amendment stripping the biotech rider and other corporate “pork” earmarks from the CR. Despite receiving calls and emails from tens of thousands of citizens opposing the industry-driven rider and supporting the amendment to strike it, the amendment was ultimately not successful. CFS calls on all Senators to join with Senator Tester and his co-sponsors to ensure that this egregious form of corporate welfare is not included in any future Appropriation bills.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022576338




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking this and hoping we forward this question to the first lady. I too am sickened. Obviously, mother earth Mar 2013 #1
Like Cheney's get-out-of-jail-free card for Big Oil to be exempted from the Clean Water act... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #7
Absolutely, it just keeps getting worst, why not? No consequences for the highest crimes. nt mother earth Mar 2013 #34
"A provison that protects the biotech giant from litigation passed Congress without..." ProSense Mar 2013 #2
ProSense are you saying we shouldn't be concerned? Generic Other Mar 2013 #3
No, ProSense Mar 2013 #4
Apparently, "Anonymous" slipped it into the bill Generic Other Mar 2013 #5
It's sort of ProSense Mar 2013 #6
Thanks, ProSense. We have 6 months to mobiliize against it being renewed. freshwest Mar 2013 #17
Of course Congress knew, Congress put the provision in the bill. TheKentuckian Mar 2013 #8
+1 Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #21
How's that Line-item veto thingy doing? Brother Buzz Mar 2013 #9
They wouldn't even let Bush have it after Clinton wanted it. Here we are. You didn't think the freshwest Mar 2013 #18
Occultism & Cronyism = Monsanto GMO playbook Berlum Mar 2013 #10
Barbara Makulski? KT2000 Mar 2013 #11
No. gcomeau Mar 2013 #25
OK - thanks KT2000 Mar 2013 #30
We have a corrupt government. Our elected leaders are continuing the corruption. Faryn Balyncd Mar 2013 #12
it didn't sneak. it's only anonymous so *you*, the public, doesn't know who put it there, but HiPointDem Mar 2013 #13
Here we go again. WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #14
Do you know who the anonymous voice was that inserted this in the bill? Generic Other Mar 2013 #15
A Democratic Senator from Maryland WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #16
Some GOP twit who doesn't have to identify himself is in Monsanto's pocket Generic Other Mar 2013 #20
Umm? gcomeau Mar 2013 #24
From the article WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #26
Guess so... gcomeau Mar 2013 #27
People's president my ass 4dsc Mar 2013 #19
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #22
Unfortunately, you don't know all the facts and Cha Mar 2013 #31
Maybe you should check how your government works? gcomeau Mar 2013 #23
Good luck getting rid of it Generic Other Mar 2013 #28
And all that had *what* to do with what I posted? -eom gcomeau Mar 2013 #33
Thanks for coming to thread with some facts, gcomeau.. Cha Mar 2013 #32
And someone please tell me this is the government of the people, for the people, and by indepat Mar 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the Monsanto Protecti...»Reply #6