Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
26. From the article
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 04:46 PM
Mar 2013
But, O'Neil added, the language did not originate with Mikulski. Rather, it was included in legislation that had been developed before she took the chairmanship. Democratic leaders, including Mikulski, were under pressure to pass a funding a bill quickly as Democrats and Republicans in Congress were eager to demonstrate they could deal with a budget deadline without creating the type of fiscal showdown that has defined the last several years.

Congress had until March 27 to pass a funding bill or shut down the government.

Mikulski picked up the previously agreed-to language and attached it, largely unchanged, to the funding legislation. Sen. Jon Tester, a Montana Democrat, offered an amendment to strike the language from the bill but that amendment never received a vote.

"Her hands were tied by the negotiations that had previously happened," O'Neil said of Mikulski. "We recognize that the tough spot she was in."


...so we're both right, I guess.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kicking this and hoping we forward this question to the first lady. I too am sickened. Obviously, mother earth Mar 2013 #1
Like Cheney's get-out-of-jail-free card for Big Oil to be exempted from the Clean Water act... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #7
Absolutely, it just keeps getting worst, why not? No consequences for the highest crimes. nt mother earth Mar 2013 #34
"A provison that protects the biotech giant from litigation passed Congress without..." ProSense Mar 2013 #2
ProSense are you saying we shouldn't be concerned? Generic Other Mar 2013 #3
No, ProSense Mar 2013 #4
Apparently, "Anonymous" slipped it into the bill Generic Other Mar 2013 #5
It's sort of ProSense Mar 2013 #6
Thanks, ProSense. We have 6 months to mobiliize against it being renewed. freshwest Mar 2013 #17
Of course Congress knew, Congress put the provision in the bill. TheKentuckian Mar 2013 #8
+1 Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #21
How's that Line-item veto thingy doing? Brother Buzz Mar 2013 #9
They wouldn't even let Bush have it after Clinton wanted it. Here we are. You didn't think the freshwest Mar 2013 #18
Occultism & Cronyism = Monsanto GMO playbook Berlum Mar 2013 #10
Barbara Makulski? KT2000 Mar 2013 #11
No. gcomeau Mar 2013 #25
OK - thanks KT2000 Mar 2013 #30
We have a corrupt government. Our elected leaders are continuing the corruption. Faryn Balyncd Mar 2013 #12
it didn't sneak. it's only anonymous so *you*, the public, doesn't know who put it there, but HiPointDem Mar 2013 #13
Here we go again. WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #14
Do you know who the anonymous voice was that inserted this in the bill? Generic Other Mar 2013 #15
A Democratic Senator from Maryland WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #16
Some GOP twit who doesn't have to identify himself is in Monsanto's pocket Generic Other Mar 2013 #20
Umm? gcomeau Mar 2013 #24
From the article WilliamPitt Mar 2013 #26
Guess so... gcomeau Mar 2013 #27
People's president my ass 4dsc Mar 2013 #19
Post removed Post removed Mar 2013 #22
Unfortunately, you don't know all the facts and Cha Mar 2013 #31
Maybe you should check how your government works? gcomeau Mar 2013 #23
Good luck getting rid of it Generic Other Mar 2013 #28
And all that had *what* to do with what I posted? -eom gcomeau Mar 2013 #33
Thanks for coming to thread with some facts, gcomeau.. Cha Mar 2013 #32
And someone please tell me this is the government of the people, for the people, and by indepat Mar 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the Monsanto Protecti...»Reply #26