Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ok, this s the most tense I remember things [View all]TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)17. What usual suspects? I don't think our administration is lying like the last one did.
I don't doubt the military's assertion that NK's nuke program is further along than they had thought--we've been giving them money, feeding them, and trying to hold talks, but I'm not sure what we were doing intelligence-wise. Possibly we took our eye off the ball for one war that was totally bogus and another that had some initial merit but dragged on too long. The bottom line is: nothing seems to deter them from their nukes. It's possible that they only intend it for power and blackmail reasons, or to sell the technology for cash, or maybe they really are nutz. I don't want us to bet wrong and lose lots of people--and they can eff things up pretty bad even if they never use nukes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, sure. "Iran is gonna get nukes" kind of lost it's edge. Lets try "NK is gonna attack US!"
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#5
Well...they DID actually say they were going to nuke us pre-emptively. I'm not sure
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#7
Are they suicidal? Doubt THAT very much. As in: no fucking way. Posturing for sure, so what?
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#16
What usual suspects? I don't think our administration is lying like the last one did.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#17
If you think for a second your administration is NOT lying to you... FFS, look who is running CIA,
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#19
Brennan is questionable to boot with his links to torture. Hagel at least has some cred.
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#28
They might have a nuke if Russia ever gave them one. Doubt it, but lets say they do.
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#18
USSR wasn't Russia of today. Even though I doubt they did give one to NK. About the only
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#26
To piss off US, for starters. everyone keeps forgetting how close the relationship between
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#24
It's more "astoundingly ignorant assertions deserve dismissive responses." (nt)
Posteritatis
Mar 2013
#34
In your case its: "can't really say anything better than "your don't know what your talkin 'bout"
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#35
I'm old enough to remember the Cuban Missile Crisis, having even gotten a call from D.C.
indepat
Mar 2013
#8
No one could know how this would play out and very little playing chicken had thereafter
indepat
Mar 2013
#30
What happens if North Korea collapses? By Harold Maass | The Week – Wed, Mar 27, 2013
nadinbrzezinski
Mar 2013
#12