sexism, lets play.

[WilliamPitt]

11. Results of Jury Service

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

How many times today do I need to see the word FAG?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Mar 29, 2013, 12:24 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Quit trying to game the alert system.

And to answer your question, at least twice. Considering it's in the graphic (which makes a good point) and -your own alert-.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: So?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I get the alert now that I see the explanation but I think this use of the word fag is OK, in that it is showing what often happens if a male is seen as overly interested in women's issues or women's rights.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.