Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

muriel_volestrangler

(105,880 posts)

1. The difference is that was about a plan to do it for all banks

Reply to dixiegrrrrl (Original post)

Fri Mar 29, 2013, 05:21 PM

Mar 2013

whereas the current plan is for the 2 banks that are insolvent. Obviously the unguaranteed deposits are at risk when a bank has failed, or there would be no need for a guarantee for the lower amounts.

The February proposal: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1d17a320-736f-11e2-9e92-00144feabdc0.html

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Decided: 37.5 percent haircut for uninsured depositors at Bank of Cyprus [View all] dixiegrrrrl Mar 2013 OP

The difference is that was about a plan to do it for all banks muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #1

Holy Mother of Pearl. Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #2

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Decided: 37.5 percent hai...»Reply #1