General Discussion

GeorgeGist

(25,570 posts)

1. How quickly they forget.

Reply to Archae (Original post)

Fri Mar 29, 2013, 07:04 PM

Mar 2013

Losers that is.

Not surprising that.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New book claims (with no real evidence,) that Shroud of Turin is "real." [View all] Archae Mar 2013 OP

How quickly they forget. GeorgeGist Mar 2013 #1

So's the Easter Bunny. NV Whino Mar 2013 #2

I saw him once, as a child, he was Mnemosyne Mar 2013 #4

Check my sig... SidDithers Mar 2013 #35

You changed it! Can't remember what is said, but it wasn't him! Mnemosyne Apr 2013 #40

It was this line from Julia Sweeney... SidDithers Apr 2013 #41

Oh yes, that's the one! Thanks Sid! Mnemosyne Apr 2013 #47

Your headline is in direct contradiction with the story at the link. former9thward Mar 2013 #3

This "new evidence" is bogus. Archae Mar 2013 #5

What does South America have to do with this? former9thward Mar 2013 #6

Because ABC talked up this "new evidence," while barely mentioning... Archae Mar 2013 #20

What else would they say? Union Scribe Mar 2013 #31

Your definition of "credible" is anything that you think backs up your POV. former9thward Mar 2013 #37

The "evidence" is quite interesting Major Nikon Mar 2013 #8

Where's his evidence for this burst of energy? Apophis Mar 2013 #11

Near as I can tell he's a professional shroud "researcher" Major Nikon Mar 2013 #16

That is not what he said in his interview with ABC former9thward Mar 2013 #14

If he said that, it only goes against his credibility Major Nikon Mar 2013 #15

Nah, they have skeptic websites Union Scribe Mar 2013 #32

+ Infinity Octafish Mar 2013 #33

...and peer reviewed evidence published in one of the most respected peer reviewed publications Major Nikon Mar 2013 #34

Jeez:Louize - the Church even found the actual forger of the shroud not long after the shroud byeya Apr 2013 #42

I remember George Will touting that line of "burst of energy." He was believing it... CTyankee Apr 2013 #45

The weave of the fabric had not been invented/developed till several hundred years after Christ died RC Mar 2013 #7

that isn't necessarily compelling dsc Mar 2013 #13

And The Fact That They Were Able To Date The Coins On The Deceased's Eyes To That Same Time Period? ChoppinBroccoli Mar 2013 #22

You are saying three reputable laboratories were wrong? RC Mar 2013 #30

I said the carbon dating is a different matter dsc Mar 2013 #36

Well, Diane SAWYER has been "buying" and "pushing" it all week... n/t UTUSN Mar 2013 #9

old book claims (with no real evidence) jesus is "real". nt msongs Mar 2013 #10

If you are suggesting Jesus never existed then you have no credibility. former9thward Mar 2013 #18

You can't even get his name right. Archae Mar 2013 #21

The baptism of Jesus and his crucifixion are all most scholars agree on. The rest is pure hogwash. Logical Mar 2013 #38

The poster does not agree Jesus existed. former9thward Mar 2013 #39

Atheism is not "religion." Archae Apr 2013 #46

As real as Mithras. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #27

It's been shown time and time again the shroud is fake. Apophis Mar 2013 #12

Because faith requires the suspension of reason to work Major Nikon Mar 2013 #17

Touché. Apophis Mar 2013 #19

Again? sakabatou Mar 2013 #23

It's real. It's just a fake, but it does exist. Ikonoklast Mar 2013 #24

So can a cop. If the subject were alive and was bleeding from the scalp, the blood would clot in the byeya Apr 2013 #44

IT'S REAL I TELL YA!... Bigmack Mar 2013 #25

Oh please.... defacto7 Mar 2013 #26

Joe Nickell put this to bed long ago. longship Mar 2013 #28

First, infra-red spectra are almost useless for determining the age of a substance. DetlefK Mar 2013 #29

i almost fell off my unicorn when i read that spanone Apr 2013 #43