Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jmg257

(11,996 posts)

5. Not for nothing, cause I would argue right along with him against them,

Reply to bluedigger (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 30, 2013, 11:52 AM

Mar 2013

But a lifetime hunter should also be able to better explain or describe what a "high-magazine clip" is (before going viral with his tweets).
Besides the obvious question of what his personal hunting experience and extremely low round count has to do with it.

At least he is taking an active stance based on his experience, such as it is. He's clearly a simple hunter, not a 'gun guy'.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun guy in CO from Rachel Maddow last night. [View all] baldguy Mar 2013 OP

That seems unlikely. bluedigger Mar 2013 #1

My guess is that he is referring to the times he shot "at" something. IMHO. Lochloosa Mar 2013 #2

That would be believable. bluedigger Mar 2013 #3

Not for nothing, cause I would argue right along with him against them, jmg257 Mar 2013 #5

Saw that malaise Mar 2013 #4