Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
7. More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis
Sat Mar 30, 2013, 01:11 PM
Mar 2013

Other than DU and the Internets, not much info on any of this in my noosepaper and television screen.



Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis

April 23, 2012
By Douglas P. Guarino
Global Security Newswire

WASHINGTON – An internal audit has confirmed observers’ concerns that many of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s radiation monitors were out of service at the height of the 2011 Fukushima power plant meltdown in Japan, a finding one critic said raises “serious questions” about the federal government’s ability to respond to nuclear emergencies and to alert the public of their consequences (see GSN, Dec. 21, 2011).

The April 19 report by the EPA Inspector General’s Office also casts further doubt on the agency’s already controversial claims that radiation from Fukushima did not pose any public health threat on U.S. soil, said Daniel Hirsch, a nuclear policy lecturer at the University of California (Santa Cruz) and president of Committee to Bridge the Gap.

SNIP...

The report details problems with the agency’s “RadNet” monitoring system. The web of detectors is intended “to monitor environmental radioactivity in the United States to provide high-quality data for assessing public exposure and environmental impacts resulting from nuclear emergencies, and to provide baseline data during routine conditions,” the report notes.

RadNet consists of 124 stations scattered throughout U.S. territories and 40 deployable air monitors that can be sent to take readings anywhere, according to the IG report. Monitoring stations collect air, precipitation, drinking water and milk samples for analysis of radioactivity, although the audit focused on the stationary air monitors.

SNIP...

Agency contractors, meanwhile, are responsible for maintaining the monitors and repairing them when they are broken. However, according to the report, EPA has not managed those contracts as high priorities, despite having identified the monitors as “critical infrastructure” under the 2001 Patriot Act. As a result, there have been numerous delays in repairing broken monitors.

CONTINUED...

http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/audit-confirms-epa-radiation-monitors-broken-during-fukushima-crisis/



Oh, well. Things must be A-OK if EPA didn't use all their USA PATRIOT Act cash to upgrade the monitoring equipment in 2001. (I'd do the "sarcasm" thingy, but there is nothing funny about any of this.)


When I went to the link, the article is dated 3/28/2011 PearliePoo2 Mar 2013 #1
Thank you. It IS. My mistake. Octafish Mar 2013 #2
Just one of those things dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #4
Thanks. I like running a Public Service Announcement on Plutonium... Octafish Mar 2013 #5
Associated links are 2011 too. dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #3
i was wondering why excess radiation from japan would just be showing up *now*. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #25
Even though the article was written in 2011 Oilwellian Mar 2013 #6
More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis Octafish Mar 2013 #7
I wondered why we had stopped monitoring so soon. This may explain that. Overseas Mar 2013 #30
As pointed out, the article is dated nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #8
Right. marions ghost Mar 2013 #10
Radiation within 80 km of No. 1 plant said down by half Octafish Mar 2013 #14
Iirc two week ago we had a story of fish nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #16
Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved. Octafish Mar 2013 #18
Patches are hyper local papers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #19
5 Easy Ways to Spot a B.S. News Story on the Internet SidDithers Mar 2013 #9
So what? 'CRACKED' is a second-rate 'MAD' magazine. Octafish Mar 2013 #12
Just wondering why you tried to misrepresent the contributor's blog as a Forbes article...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #13
Thanks for your concern. It was on a Forbes website. Octafish Mar 2013 #15
Sid, I want to see your journal! zappaman Mar 2013 #21
What scares BFEE most is people learning about them. Octafish Mar 2013 #22
Yes! zappaman Mar 2013 #24
It's rhetorical. Do you ever post anything that adds to what we know about the BFEE, zappaman? Octafish Mar 2013 #26
K&R. More news that I missed. Overseas Mar 2013 #29
That's one thing about I like about GD, we can talk about important stuff. Octafish Mar 2013 #32
...and more will soon be on the way from N Korea. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #11
I pray not. Warmongers on both sides believe nuclear war is winnable. Octafish Mar 2013 #17
K&R Kurovski Mar 2013 #20
It's the strangest thing, getting mocked on account of the BFEE. Octafish Mar 2013 #23
I heard about that on Prison Planet. That's some mundo scary stuff there. freshwest Mar 2013 #34
I see that you realized one mistake. FBaggins Mar 2013 #27
Like, really. Compared to three meltdowns and exposed spent fuel pools, I did a bad. Octafish Mar 2013 #31
No I didn't catch the story on my local news. Overseas Mar 2013 #28
Here's something about nuclear war no one at Easter dinner knew about... Octafish Mar 2013 #33
How many years is Fukushima expected to keep releasing radiation? Trillo Apr 2013 #35
Four decades is as good a guess as any I've found. Octafish Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA: Expect More Radiatio...»Reply #7