Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EPA: Expect More Radiation in Rainwater [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)14. Radiation within 80 km of No. 1 plant said down by half
Which sounds good, until one reads that it's only for Cesium-134, with a half-life of 2.5 years.
One of the few articles on the subject:
Radiation within 80 km of No. 1 plant said down by half
KYODO
MAR 12, 2013
Radiation levels in areas within 80 km of the crippled Fukushima No. 1 power plant fell by nearly half over the 20-month period between April 2011 and last November, a government-affiliated body said.
The level is declining more quickly than anticipated thanks to rain and the two-year half-life of cesium-134, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency said Sunday. The rain apparently washed the fallout produced by the three reactor core meltdowns triggered by the March 2011 quake and tsunami to other areas via the regional drainage system. The decline was particularly rapid in areas with many buildings and asphalt roads, the agency said.
The agency analyzed radiation readings taken 1 meter aboveground, using data collected by the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry. According to the estimates, radiation levels fell 30 percent from April 2011 to November 2011, and had dropped to half by November 2012.
The agency believes most of the drop is due to the elements, not government decontamination efforts. [font color="green"]Where the tainted rainwater ends up, however, is another matter.[/font color]
In November, the fall slowed after the radiation from cesium-134, which has a half-life of two years, fell to half, the agency said. [font color="green"]But the energy from the more prevalent cesium-137, whose half-life is 30 years, hasnt changed.[/font color]
SOURCE: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/03/12/national/radiation-within-80-km-radius-of-fukushima-plant-fallen-by-half/#.UVckixcp92A
Of course, no mention anywhere about plutonium, americium, strontium...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i was wondering why excess radiation from japan would just be showing up *now*.
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#25
More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis
Octafish
Mar 2013
#7
Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#18
Just wondering why you tried to misrepresent the contributor's blog as a Forbes article...nt
SidDithers
Mar 2013
#13
It's rhetorical. Do you ever post anything that adds to what we know about the BFEE, zappaman?
Octafish
Mar 2013
#26
Like, really. Compared to three meltdowns and exposed spent fuel pools, I did a bad.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#31