OK. Obama/Duncan/Gates School "Reform" Model: The results Are IN !!! Today's NYT: P. A1

[reACTIONary]

38. I think your observation may refer to a restrictive subset of tests...

... such as multiple choice and short answer.

And I don't agree that such tests can not measure understanding. In a well designed test, one must understand the question, understand the several answers and make a judgement as to which of them is the best, if not right. Furthermore, in a well designed test, the wrong answers will contain a contradiction or inaccuracy that requires understanding to detect. It seems to me that a well designed test does require understanding to select the right or best answer and does not simply consist of "parroting".

While it may not be possible to give the "right" answer to the question ""Why did the US invade Iraq?"" it should be possible to test an understanding of the various "right answers" that have been given, an understanding of the cultural differences that surround the issue, and an understanding of the policy alternatives and their consequences.

And scientific knowledge is not as open to "opinion" as is a question involving foreign policy. If you ask a student what the product of photosynthesis is, and he selects "protean" instead of "glucose" he's just guessing and doesn't understand.

Demonstrating a skill, especially a mental skill, also demonstrates understanding. If you can find the right answer to a new math problem you are demonstrating an understanding of math.

And while basic facts may not constitute "understanding", facts are important to being able to use your understanding. And a knowledge of factual material can certainly be tested by even the simplest tests.

The bigger question is, however, if we don't use tests what do we use to measure the performance of our school system and ensure our children are getting the education they deserve? What would you suggest?