Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New study finds no link between 'too many vaccines' and autism [View all]http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-03-state-highest-autism-range.html
State with one of highest rates of autism turns out to be in normal range
March 26, 2013
by Mary Jo Layton in Autism spectrum disorders
When New Jersey reported one of the nation's highest rates of autism last year - doubling in six years to one in 49 children - researchers described it as "beyond an emergency." But a federal study released this past week indicated that the high rate appears to be the norm nationally. Autism spectrum disorder now affects one in every 50 children, well above the one in 88 previously reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"The good news is that the increase in autism isn't special to New Jersey," said Walter Zahorodny, an autism researcher at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. "The bad news is that it's a significant increase and it's registering everywhere."
The findings released this past week by the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration and the CDC are spurring debate: While experts attribute the increase to better reporting, it also suggests that the disorder is being diagnosed more frequently in children with milder symptoms.
According to the study, 1 million children nationally are diagnosed with autism, a complex disorder that affects brain development and a person's ability to communicate, learn and form relationships.
"The feeling all along wasn't that New Jersey has more cases of autism - New Jersey was just more rigorous in ascertaining the incidence," said Dr. Joseph Holahan, medical director of the child development center at St. Joseph's Children's Hospital in Paterson. "It's still one of the most common serious developmental disorders we see."
<>
"We still think one in 50 is an underestimate," said Michael Rosanoff, associate director for public health research and scientific review for the advocacy group Autism Speaks.
The real issue is we need to meet the demands of this public health crisis," said Rosanoff said. "This should be a wake-up call."
<>
State with one of highest rates of autism turns out to be in normal range
March 26, 2013
by Mary Jo Layton in Autism spectrum disorders
When New Jersey reported one of the nation's highest rates of autism last year - doubling in six years to one in 49 children - researchers described it as "beyond an emergency." But a federal study released this past week indicated that the high rate appears to be the norm nationally. Autism spectrum disorder now affects one in every 50 children, well above the one in 88 previously reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"The good news is that the increase in autism isn't special to New Jersey," said Walter Zahorodny, an autism researcher at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. "The bad news is that it's a significant increase and it's registering everywhere."
The findings released this past week by the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration and the CDC are spurring debate: While experts attribute the increase to better reporting, it also suggests that the disorder is being diagnosed more frequently in children with milder symptoms.
According to the study, 1 million children nationally are diagnosed with autism, a complex disorder that affects brain development and a person's ability to communicate, learn and form relationships.
"The feeling all along wasn't that New Jersey has more cases of autism - New Jersey was just more rigorous in ascertaining the incidence," said Dr. Joseph Holahan, medical director of the child development center at St. Joseph's Children's Hospital in Paterson. "It's still one of the most common serious developmental disorders we see."
<>
"We still think one in 50 is an underestimate," said Michael Rosanoff, associate director for public health research and scientific review for the advocacy group Autism Speaks.
The real issue is we need to meet the demands of this public health crisis," said Rosanoff said. "This should be a wake-up call."
<>
Re: last year's CDC numbers from more rigorously designed study (with the 1 in 49 NJ stat),
Eighty percent of the children with autism in the New Jersey study were identified as having the most severe form of the disorder. Boys were more than five times as likely to be diagnosed as girls, both in New Jersey and in the rest of the country.
Read more at: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-03-state-highest-autism-range.html#jCp
Eighty percent of the children with autism in the New Jersey study were identified as having the most severe form of the disorder. Boys were more than five times as likely to be diagnosed as girls, both in New Jersey and in the rest of the country.
Read more at: http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-03-state-highest-autism-range.html#jCp
Link from: http://www.ageofautism.com/2013/03/dachel-media-update-autism-awareness-assault.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The majority have a child with autism and have ZERO ulterior motives to mislead or misdirect.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#57
That factor alone doesn't cut it, I agree with you. They are saying to the public there is more.
proverbialwisdom
Apr 2013
#63
Please see graphics in posts #33 , #35 and #59 together in order to grasp the concerns of many @AOA.
proverbialwisdom
Apr 2013
#65
So forget the analogy. Recent remarks by these four establishment researchers contradict the study.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#15
I'd like to recommend that you read these quotes in their full context at the linked posts.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#25
"Dr. Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer for the advocacy group Autism Speaks."
Starry Messenger
Mar 2013
#34
That 2009 publicity campaign sounds abysmal, though created by two fathers of children with autism.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#39
it shames me that people think age of autism our adventure in autism should be
Godhumor
Mar 2013
#20
Unsupportable and unsustainable given the current health trends. Wait and see.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#58
some of those funds need to be directed towards transitioning adults from school to work and
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2013
#28
The implications of the flawed control group design discussed here by AOA contributor J.Thompson.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#17
Please consider the primary sources cited, NOT the news aggregator/analysis websites, per se. nt
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#26
Then you should post the primary source without the advocacy site middleman...nt
SidDithers
Mar 2013
#27
Ginger Taylor: Overall health outcomes matter, not merely reduction of communicable disease levels.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#35
I was quoting Ginger Taylor's recent testimony before the Maine legislature re: informed consent.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#40
I don't have more time to spend on this, however... according to research posted at AOA,
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2013
#59
Now that you are locked out, you really won't be adding anymore tripe to this thread!
morningfog
Apr 2013
#75
Exactly. So what about the 99% of EVERYONE ELSE who's vaccinated and WITHOUT autism
alp227
Apr 2013
#70
That's because all the research supports vaccines. Those who refuse vaccines are selfish
morningfog
Apr 2013
#74