Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EPA: Expect More Radiation in Rainwater [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)18. Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved.
That is a great story, nadinsita. We're finding that when it comes to radiation, even the Pacific Ocean ain't big enough.
Oh well, there's the bright side. That Stanford researcher found the nuclear tuna helps us better track their migration, which is good.
NUCLEAR TUNA
Traces of Fukushima radiation help scientists track Pacific bluefin migration.
By Kera Abraham
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Pacific bluefin tuna that swam off the Japanese coast after the 2011 nuclear meltdown carry radioactive memorabilia of the Fukushima disaster. Thats the splashy news out of Stanford Universitys Hopkins Marine Station in Pacific Grove.
But fear of nuclear seafood is not the point, according to doctoral student and study lead Daniel Madigan; the radiation level is so low its not really a health concern. More importantly, the glimmers of cesium-137 and cesium-134 in bluefin flesh help scientists map their movement. And that could be key to more sustainable management.
Pacific bluefin are down about 96 percent from their historic population levels, according to a December stock assessment. Its still on our avoid list, says Alison Barratt, spokeswoman for the Monterey Bay Aquariums Seafood Watch program. The stock is doing really badly.
Madigan sampled young bluefin bycatch a few months after the meltdowns of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors. Because Pacific bluefin only spawn near Japan, he wondered if these 1 to 2-year-old fish carried contaminants from the accident. Madigan sent 15 samples to a marine radioactivity expert at Stony Brook University.
He called me after the first (sample) and was like, Youre not going to believe it, but theyre carrying the cesium from Fukushima, Madigan recalls.
CONTINUED...
http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/news/2013/mar/14/nuclear-tuna/
Don't want to meltdown anybody's personal copy of CRACKED, but blogger-fueled Palo Alto Patch had the new a week earlier.
Hmmm. Maybe it's because the Montery County Weekly is a...weekly!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i was wondering why excess radiation from japan would just be showing up *now*.
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#25
More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis
Octafish
Mar 2013
#7
Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#18
Just wondering why you tried to misrepresent the contributor's blog as a Forbes article...nt
SidDithers
Mar 2013
#13
It's rhetorical. Do you ever post anything that adds to what we know about the BFEE, zappaman?
Octafish
Mar 2013
#26
Like, really. Compared to three meltdowns and exposed spent fuel pools, I did a bad.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#31