Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The “Monsanto Protection Act”, and why you were duped [View all]
http://www.forwardprogressives.com/the-monsanto-protection-act-and-why-you-were-duped/?w3tc_note=flush_browser_cacheThe Monsanto Protection Act, and why you were duped
March 30, 2013
By Manny Schewitz
snip//
I think theres even more to it though. I recently suggested in an article Poisoning the tree of progressive activism that there is an effort to dumb down, divide and destroy the progressive movement. This Monsanto Protection Act is nothing more than Section 735 of the budget bill HR 933 but the uninformed response to it is proof to me that my suspicions are correct. This issue was only covered by hack sites like Natural News but rushed to prominence by a number of social media sites as if it was the gospel truth. There are things to be concerned about with Monsanto but repeating false stories and exaggerations does not further the anti-GMO cause. If you want to educate the public, who happens to be almost completely unaware of what Monsanto is about, you need to present facts, not fiction.
Its a really simple, dirty and ingenious trick if you think about it. Create a fake outrage and blow it up, get the easily spooked to believe it and spread the misinformation. Convince your opponents supporters that their leader sold them out and your work is done, with minimal cost or effort on your part. Once that support is eroded, you can ram through legislation that actually gives real and dangerous protections to bad companies like Monsanto and others.
Just because we won in November 2012 doesnt mean entities like A.L.E.C., the Heritage Foundation and shadow groups funded by the Koch brothers arent already working on 2014 and beyond. Theyve learned that their message sucks and no matter how much money they give a candidate, it doesnt necessarily translate into votes.
So how do they cope with the fact that the demographic that supports them the most is dying off and they cant convince the younger generation to support them? The strategy is to erode the base on the other side and thats exactly what theyre doing right now. Theyre doing everything to convince us that Obama sold us out and that the change we voted for turned out to be more of the same. Theyd even have you believe that the President slipped section 735 in there himself. If youre bright enough to put the pieces together, its pretty easy to see.
If you cant get people to vote for you, the next best thing is to get the other side not to turn out. Thats their strategy, and thats what this Monsanto Protection Act outrage is all about.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And yet nothing here dispels the specifics about how Monsanto is indemnified against the havoc
villager
Mar 2013
#1
Sort of like the "temporary" Patriot Act, Guantanamo Bay detentions, tax cuts for the rich, etc.?
villager
Mar 2013
#10
Oh, the message here is that we librul Obama-haters better vote for anything with
djean111
Mar 2013
#3
That's it? He's helpless because he "doesn't have one item Veto Powers"?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#52
And some here wanted him to veto the entire bill to keep governent going past the 27th.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#25
Gotta think two steps ahead. Panic eliminates reflection, turns it into reaction without reason.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#43
The way you've done that twice on this thread (and more elsewhere that I can recall)
Occulus
Mar 2013
#13
I'm also part of the same conspiracy of retired anonymous posters who appreciate good posts.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#24
Strawman: "Defeatists say those who don't sneer at Obama are fools". Why isn't the truth good enough
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#54
The section in question prohibits Monsanto suing farmers from selling cross pollinated crops.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#48
I googled the hell out of this yesterday and there are numerous threads. Sorry.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#55
I know - but if I'm gonna complain about them not doing it, I'm gonna have to point that out. (nt)
jeff47
Mar 2013
#85
This is important, if true. Do you have a link to that? A link to the actual language in the Act
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#53
Strawman: "They’d even have you believe that the President slipped section 735 in there himself."
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#34
Why don't you take your own advice and read the thread plus related information?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#51
STRAWMAN: Until someone other than you claims that Tayor and Vilsack wrote the bill, you are just
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#88