Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The “Monsanto Protection Act”, and why you were duped [View all]WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)15. THIS.
Thank you.
K&R.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And yet nothing here dispels the specifics about how Monsanto is indemnified against the havoc
villager
Mar 2013
#1
Sort of like the "temporary" Patriot Act, Guantanamo Bay detentions, tax cuts for the rich, etc.?
villager
Mar 2013
#10
Oh, the message here is that we librul Obama-haters better vote for anything with
djean111
Mar 2013
#3
That's it? He's helpless because he "doesn't have one item Veto Powers"?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#52
And some here wanted him to veto the entire bill to keep governent going past the 27th.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#25
Gotta think two steps ahead. Panic eliminates reflection, turns it into reaction without reason.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#43
The way you've done that twice on this thread (and more elsewhere that I can recall)
Occulus
Mar 2013
#13
I'm also part of the same conspiracy of retired anonymous posters who appreciate good posts.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#24
Strawman: "Defeatists say those who don't sneer at Obama are fools". Why isn't the truth good enough
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#54
The section in question prohibits Monsanto suing farmers from selling cross pollinated crops.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#48
I googled the hell out of this yesterday and there are numerous threads. Sorry.
freshwest
Mar 2013
#55
I know - but if I'm gonna complain about them not doing it, I'm gonna have to point that out. (nt)
jeff47
Mar 2013
#85
This is important, if true. Do you have a link to that? A link to the actual language in the Act
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#53
Strawman: "They’d even have you believe that the President slipped section 735 in there himself."
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#34
Why don't you take your own advice and read the thread plus related information?
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#51
STRAWMAN: Until someone other than you claims that Tayor and Vilsack wrote the bill, you are just
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#88