Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There are a lot of reasons someone would want to fire 30 rounds without reloading [View all]jazzimov
(1,456 posts)34. How about Australia and the UK?
Objective: To determine whether Australias 1996 major gun law reforms were associated with changes in rates of mass firearm homicides, total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides, and whether there were any apparent method substitution effects for total homicides and suicides.
........
Results: In the 18 years before the gun law reforms, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, and none in the 10.5 years afterwards. Declines in firearm-related deaths before the law reforms accelerated after the reforms for total firearm deaths (p = 0.04), firearm suicides (p = 0.007) and firearm homicides (p = 0.15), but not for the smallest category of unintentional firearm deaths, which increased. No evidence of substitution effect for suicides or homicides was observed. The rates per 100 000 of total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides all at least doubled their existing rates of decline after the revised gun laws.
Conclusions: Australias 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid-firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides.
http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/12/6/365.full
In the United Kingdom, firearms are tightly controlled by law,
.....
The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world. There were 0.07 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in 2010, compared to the 3.0 in the United States (over 40 times higher) and 0.21 in Germany (3 times higher).
........
In 2012 the Home Office reported that, "in 2010/11, firearms were involved in 11,227 recorded offences (statistics limited to England and Wales), the seventh consecutive annual fall".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_Kingdom
OH, I'm sorry - you said ONLY assault weapons. Maybe Obama really SHOULD "take away" everyone's guns!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
There are a lot of reasons someone would want to fire 30 rounds without reloading [View all]
Snarkoleptic
Mar 2013
OP
Instead of grave-dancing, why not try offering suggestions to make the AWB better & more effective?
baldguy
Mar 2013
#8
Except that other countries that ban assault weapons have a much lower rate of gun violence.
baldguy
Mar 2013
#13
What country only bans so called assault weapons and saw a change in murder rates?
aikoaiko
Mar 2013
#15
No loopholes. Lanza's rifle was defined in 1994 by DiFi, Joe Biden et al as AOK to own.
aikoaiko
Mar 2013
#27
I'd like to see proof of that. Please provide a link showing that Sen Feinstein and VP Biden
baldguy
Mar 2013
#29
Oh, there's a VERY good reason. After a case of Miller Lite, you NEED 30 rounds...
talkingmime
Mar 2013
#31
Depending upon how one defines them there are probably billions of "assault" magazines
Peter cotton
Mar 2013
#41