Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
34. How about Australia and the UK?
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 03:22 AM
Mar 2013
Objective: To determine whether Australia’s 1996 major gun law reforms were associated with changes in rates of mass firearm homicides, total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides, and whether there were any apparent method substitution effects for total homicides and suicides.
........
Results: In the 18 years before the gun law reforms, there were 13 mass shootings in Australia, and none in the 10.5 years afterwards. Declines in firearm-related deaths before the law reforms accelerated after the reforms for total firearm deaths (p = 0.04), firearm suicides (p = 0.007) and firearm homicides (p = 0.15), but not for the smallest category of unintentional firearm deaths, which increased. No evidence of substitution effect for suicides or homicides was observed. The rates per 100 000 of total firearm deaths, firearm homicides and firearm suicides all at least doubled their existing rates of decline after the revised gun laws.

Conclusions: Australia’s 1996 gun law reforms were followed by more than a decade free of fatal mass shootings, and accelerated declines in firearm deaths, particularly suicides. Total homicide rates followed the same pattern. Removing large numbers of rapid-firing firearms from civilians may be an effective way of reducing mass shootings, firearm homicides and firearm suicides.


http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/12/6/365.full


In the United Kingdom, firearms are tightly controlled by law,
.....
The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world. There were 0.07 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in 2010, compared to the 3.0 in the United States (over 40 times higher) and 0.21 in Germany (3 times higher).
........
In 2012 the Home Office reported that, "in 2010/11, firearms were involved in 11,227 recorded offences (statistics limited to England and Wales), the seventh consecutive annual fall".


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_Kingdom

OH, I'm sorry - you said ONLY assault weapons. Maybe Obama really SHOULD "take away" everyone's guns!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"All of them are shitty." 99Forever Mar 2013 #1
Kicked X 154 Paladin Mar 2013 #2
"All of them are shitty" lobodons Mar 2013 #3
One reason: if you're in the military. . . DinahMoeHum Mar 2013 #4
+1 freshwest Mar 2013 #33
I was getting ready to say essentially the same thing Victor_c3 Mar 2013 #35
Need a background check to enlist?? Touche!! DinahMoeHum Mar 2013 #44
Go ahead and get it out - the AWB has failed. aikoaiko Mar 2013 #5
Well, the coroner said he did. AtheistCrusader Mar 2013 #7
Not sure either. JimDandy Mar 2013 #18
Instead of grave-dancing, why not try offering suggestions to make the AWB better & more effective? baldguy Mar 2013 #8
The AWB as a means of reducing violence is flawed at the start aikoaiko Mar 2013 #12
Except that other countries that ban assault weapons have a much lower rate of gun violence. baldguy Mar 2013 #13
What country only bans so called assault weapons and saw a change in murder rates? aikoaiko Mar 2013 #15
What country allows assault weapons and saw a change in murder rates? baldguy Mar 2013 #16
I'm with Baldguy-back your claim up curlyred Mar 2013 #17
Adam Lanza - his rifle was compliant with the 1994 AWB aikoaiko Mar 2013 #21
That's because it was so riddled with loopholes from RW NRA lobbyists. baldguy Mar 2013 #25
No loopholes. Lanza's rifle was defined in 1994 by DiFi, Joe Biden et al as AOK to own. aikoaiko Mar 2013 #27
I'd like to see proof of that. Please provide a link showing that Sen Feinstein and VP Biden baldguy Mar 2013 #29
Show you where allowing them works? I have never heard of them working. aikoaiko Mar 2013 #23
How about Australia and the UK? jazzimov Mar 2013 #34
That's right. I said only assault weapons aikoaiko Mar 2013 #36
Wow, you are generous in your selfishness. All those solutions and not a single jmg257 Mar 2013 #20
Universal background checks are important aikoaiko Mar 2013 #30
Oh i do, and not half-assed either...100%, and combined with registration. jmg257 Mar 2013 #32
Message auto-removed Baraki Mar 2013 #39
There's an extremely good reason: IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #6
If you want to punch holes in a piece of paper Doc_Technical Mar 2013 #10
I could also use a bow and arrow IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #11
I could also use a bow and arrow AlbertCat Mar 2013 #22
You see? They're more useful than we thought. IveWornAHundredPants Mar 2013 #24
"Because I can" was the reason I was given when discussing this last night neverforget Mar 2013 #9
That's the justification they need to remember when the government interest jmg257 Mar 2013 #28
No, thats not how it works. beevul Mar 2013 #38
Agreed on several points. No doubt about selfishness. jmg257 Mar 2013 #40
Gotta stop the zombie deer... Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2013 #14
That's the exception to the rule! Snarkoleptic Mar 2013 #19
Yet the gun violence apologists here love those reasons! villager Mar 2013 #26
Oh, there's a VERY good reason. After a case of Miller Lite, you NEED 30 rounds... talkingmime Mar 2013 #31
If they are so evil hack89 Mar 2013 #37
Depending upon how one defines them there are probably billions of "assault" magazines Peter cotton Mar 2013 #41
Largely because our pols haven't the stomach to take on the issue. Snarkoleptic Mar 2013 #42
They are proposing effective legislation hack89 Mar 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are a lot of reason...»Reply #34