Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren Takes Off the Gloves [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)28. Federal Reserve Chair: ‘Too Big To Fail’ Banks Still A Problem
Federal Reserve Chair: Too Big To Fail Banks Still A Problem
By Travis Waldron
Amid rising concerns about large banks from senators, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that too big to fail banks still pose a major risk to the American economy. Massachusetts Sen. Elizatbeth Warren (D) grilled Bernanke over the persistence of Too Big To Fail institutions during a Senate hearing last week, and at a press conference yesterday, Bernanke made it clear that he agrees with Warren that such banks are still a major issue that need to be addressed:
Warrens reputation as a critic of Wall Street followed her to the Senate, where she has questioned regulators over bank prosecutions and whether large financial institutions were too big for trial. But Warren isnt alone: Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter (R) are prepping legislation to reduce the size of large banks, and Brown and Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) have also pressed regulators and the Justice Dept. over the lack of prosecutions that creates the perception that banks have a get out of jail free card.
The largest banks, as this chart Brown displayed on the Senate floor last month shows, have only grown larger since the financial crisis:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03/21/1754021/bernanke-too-big-to-fail/
By Travis Waldron
Amid rising concerns about large banks from senators, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said Tuesday that too big to fail banks still pose a major risk to the American economy. Massachusetts Sen. Elizatbeth Warren (D) grilled Bernanke over the persistence of Too Big To Fail institutions during a Senate hearing last week, and at a press conference yesterday, Bernanke made it clear that he agrees with Warren that such banks are still a major issue that need to be addressed:
BERNANKE: I certainly never meant to say to Senator Warren, and I share her concern about Too Big To Fail, its a major issue. I never meant to imply that the problem was solved and gone. It is not solved and gone. I hope that well make progress against Too Big To Fail, because I agree with her 100 percent that its a real problem and needs to be addressed if at all possible.
Warrens reputation as a critic of Wall Street followed her to the Senate, where she has questioned regulators over bank prosecutions and whether large financial institutions were too big for trial. But Warren isnt alone: Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter (R) are prepping legislation to reduce the size of large banks, and Brown and Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) have also pressed regulators and the Justice Dept. over the lack of prosecutions that creates the perception that banks have a get out of jail free card.
The largest banks, as this chart Brown displayed on the Senate floor last month shows, have only grown larger since the financial crisis:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/03/21/1754021/bernanke-too-big-to-fail/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You prefer a Republican Congress? Makes sense to me, the policies are up your alley.
Dragonfli
Mar 2013
#74
Would Warren agree/ask/demand cuts to benefits for the poor, the sick, and the permanently disabled?
MannyGoldstein
Mar 2013
#97
Actually I'm not lauding any of them. I prefer Hillary's route for newbie Senators.
dkf
Mar 2013
#26
Complaining that the market isn't recognizing the assertion that the Government will let banks fail
dkf
Mar 2013
#59
I think Rand Paul, at first, used to be up front about his concerns/beliefs. He still is to some
gateley
Mar 2013
#27
The Cyprus banks are failing because they got too big to fail for a country
JDPriestly
Apr 2013
#117
It's still rock and roll to me. Elizabeth is part of Team Obama. Member in good standing.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#13
You can have her six terms in the Senate. I would rather get her in the White House
Autumn
Mar 2013
#16
Hug is appreciated but maybe we can share? A month here, a month back in US? Please?
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#25
Well, that's not bad actually. We can always win her over and convince her to stay here for a bit to
idwiyo
Mar 2013
#38
I think you nailed it -- the difference. Elizabeth warren is passionate about what is happening
gateley
Mar 2013
#30
Still smarting from that horrible, awful, no-good day you had almost five months ago?
2ndAmForComputers
Mar 2013
#71
And a liar; as he makes up stories about people he knew from the past calling them a, Pink-o
DhhD
Mar 2013
#60
what do we have to do to make sure that voices like Warren dominate the party not
yurbud
Mar 2013
#79
