Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I decided I'll back Hillary to the hilt if she [View all]DonViejo
(60,536 posts)68. I'm certain this wasn't the only issue the Congress...
Last edited Sun Mar 31, 2013, 02:29 PM - Edit history (1)
has blocked a President's ability to issue Executive Orders on. In fact, the entire issue of gays in the military was an issue taken away from the President's authority when it passed DADT under President Clinton. 'Pukes and not yet evolved Dems were afraid Clinton (or one of his successors) would issue an executive order similar to the one Truman issued integrating the Armed Forces.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
159 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Congress retains the power of the purse, and they have explicitly forbid $1 US dollar from
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2013
#104
Congress has explicitly forbid the federal government from spending a dollar to transfer any Gitmo
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2013
#107
That's not an answer to how you transfer prisoners when there is an explicit prohibition on
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2013
#114
It is good for tourism and nostalgia, Like royalty in England he has no power but
Dragonfli
Mar 2013
#78
I would support her if she runs and wins the primary, but I would prefer Warren or Grayson. nt
NYC_SKP
Mar 2013
#4
I'm done with primary campaign work for moderates, triangulators, and pragmatists
HereSince1628
Mar 2013
#10
Liberal? You mean like her IWR vote and vocal support for Bush's Iraq adventure?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#22
Liberal? You mean like her touting the "advantages" of outsourcing and increasing h1-b visas?
antigop
Mar 2013
#30
I'll note at the end of the video she clearly says she thinks more Americans should be trained to
quinnox
Mar 2013
#38
We have PLENTY of engineers and IT people that are trained now whose jobs have been
antigop
Mar 2013
#41
Telling the truth is NOT bashing. I think you have nothing to add because you cannot defend
antigop
Mar 2013
#121
Clear and concise reasoning for not supporting a Clinton bid to be the nominee.
chknltl
Mar 2013
#117
Oh Goodie, a war hawk who is cozy with the Bushes & defense industry. woohoo.
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#11
Due to the state of the country, her ideology is unacceptably dangerous being dedicated
TheKentuckian
Mar 2013
#12
No, it's damn well time we have a president who sticks up for American workers.
antigop
Mar 2013
#35
I won't. She's a foreign-policy failure. She's learned nothing from her IWR days.
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#39
SoS was a you scratch my back/I'll scratch yours deal. She was pretty much a figurehead
TwilightGardener
Mar 2013
#52
It was in Obama's interest to say so - otherwise he is saying HIS policy was a failure.
karynnj
Mar 2013
#120
A lot of people in this thread are going to get banned from DU if they don't vote for the nominee.
Starry Messenger
Mar 2013
#74
Whoever it takes to bar the gates of hell and keep the Republicans down there
aint_no_life_nowhere
Mar 2013
#88
I can't back any more DLC corporate politicians, the people can't take much more triangulated
Dragonfli
Mar 2013
#89
Michelle can continue to do that in 2024 and 2028. 2016 is too early for that.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#113
I thought you were going to say "if she regularly mentioned kittycats", LOL
just1voice
Mar 2013
#111
You remind me of Freepers who think the same joke is just as funny the 1000th time they tell it.
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#134
Nope, that's my belief. if that bothers you, you better find a way to deal. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#140
You"ll just have to deal with my adding to the "inevitability" meme counter when I see it. nt
antigop
Mar 2013
#141
And you will have to deal with me pointing how freeperesque it is to tell the same joke 1000 times.
stevenleser
Mar 2013
#148
and I'll add to the counter every time someone tries to spread the "inevitability" meme. nt
antigop
Mar 2013
#137
Why does it bother you so much when I call out the "inevitability" meme? Hmmmm????? nt
antigop
Mar 2013
#143
It's not intended to be funny, but it really seems to bother you when I point it out. nt
antigop
Mar 2013
#150
She wanted the last one, too. Enough to try to scam it with superdelegates. We stopped her.
Poll_Blind
Mar 2013
#142
I will only support her if she completely rejects the policies of Obama and her Hubby
Demo_Chris
Mar 2013
#123