Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michael Taylor: Monsanto's Man? [View all]jazzimov
(1,456 posts)3. Please read the rest of the Wiki article
Upon arriving at the FDA in the summer of 1991, Taylor recused himself for one year from taking part in any agency action dealing directly with Monsanto or any other King and Spalding clients."[13] It also reported that "Some longtime agency critics found the charges against Taylor misplaced. Sidney Wolfe, a physician who heads the Public Citizen Health Research Group here, has filed complaints with the FDA about revolving-door ethics issues concerning other officials. But he said yesterday that 'It's barking up a silly kind of tree to be going up against Mike Taylor.' Wolfe said that 'as far as we're concerned, he's done a perfectly good job.' Wolfe compared Rifkin's charges to saying that anyone who worked for a drug company and began working for the FDA should not be allowed to say anything about drugs in general -- a stance that Wolfe characterized as 'preposterous.'"
Also:
During this time, according to Marion Nestle, Taylor made strong arguments for a more rigorous and unified approach to food safety, in which he argued for:
"A single agency accountable for providing consistent and coordinated oversight of food safety, from farm to table.
Institution of Pathogen Reduction: HACCP, with performance standards verified by pathogen testing, at every step of food production.
Recall authority, access to records, and penalties for lapses in safety procedures.
Standards for imported foods equivalent to those for domestic foods.
Food safety to take precedence over commercial considerations in trade disputes."
Also much, much more which argues for Taylor's competency, rather than against.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why, sabrina. One might get the impression you're following me from thread to thread...
SidDithers
Apr 2013
#51
assistance in Africa. In collusion with the Rockefeller/ Bill and Melinda Gates foundations
lunasun
Mar 2013
#7
I wonder how many of those 250,000 had a clue of what was actually in that provision...
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#17
Yes, you really did in effect say that the 250,000 petition signers are uneducated rubes
brentspeak
Mar 2013
#41