Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michael Taylor: Monsanto's Man? [View all]brentspeak
(18,290 posts)22. Probably most of them
Which means that 250,000 people know a whole hell of lot more about the provision than you.
The "totally temporary" part is already well-understood to mean that until the next spending bill, we all get to be exposed to GMO and GE crops and that Monsanto and other GMO/GE seed producers are granted almost unprecedented court immunity during legal challenges. No one -- except for you -- ever claimed it was permanent provision. But manufacturing that red herring sure makes for one clumsy attempt at discrediting opponents of the provision.
"The provision was already in existence?"
A provision to grant court immunity wasn't in existence until last week when Obama signed it into law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why, sabrina. One might get the impression you're following me from thread to thread...
SidDithers
Apr 2013
#51
assistance in Africa. In collusion with the Rockefeller/ Bill and Melinda Gates foundations
lunasun
Mar 2013
#7
I wonder how many of those 250,000 had a clue of what was actually in that provision...
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#17
Yes, you really did in effect say that the 250,000 petition signers are uneducated rubes
brentspeak
Mar 2013
#41