Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Michael Taylor: Monsanto's Man? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)47. Thanks for what?
When Taylor returned to government as Deputy Commissioner for Policy for the FDA from 1991 to 1994, the agency approved the use of Monsanto's GM growth hormone for dairy cows (now found in most U.S. milk) without labeling. His role in these decisions led to a federal investigation, though eventually he was exonerated of all conflict-of-interest charges.
So we have a Monsanto CEO in charge of the FDA, who was in charge of the FDA when they ended up under federal investigation for what they did to the food supply??
Since when did Democrats start loving Monsanto? Are you at all familiar with this Corporation? I don't think I have ever met a Democrat who supported this Corporation until the past few weeks. I keep asking people who do, to explain it, to present something that this Corporation is doing that warrants any defense at all, so far I have not received a single answer.
Republicans have always supported evil Corps like Monsanto. When I asked THEM why, they claimed that 'since people in Africa are so inferior, unable to feed themselves, even if genetically modified food does cause cancer, 'it's better than starving'. The level of ignorance and bigotry in this kind of response, should be obvious. But now, I am seeing whispers of this defense coming from the 'left' in their efforts to try to defend the appointments of Monsanto CEOs to a democratic administration.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why, sabrina. One might get the impression you're following me from thread to thread...
SidDithers
Apr 2013
#51
assistance in Africa. In collusion with the Rockefeller/ Bill and Melinda Gates foundations
lunasun
Mar 2013
#7
I wonder how many of those 250,000 had a clue of what was actually in that provision...
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#17
Yes, you really did in effect say that the 250,000 petition signers are uneducated rubes
brentspeak
Mar 2013
#41