Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

magellan

(13,257 posts)
27. Love it
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 04:13 AM
Apr 2013

And yes, it makes absolutely perfect sense, doesn't it? Yet I've had so many run ins with ultra-religious types where they don't seem to get this simple concept. They display the kind of thinking I'd expect from a child...yet even a child will accept reason. Heck, most children reason better than a lot of adults do, the little free thinkers.

In my experience, the sort of person who'd argue that marriage - or by extension, sex - is about procreation, is pretty much immune to the discomforts of logic. They put their bible before the Constitution, and that's the problem: they don't understand that freedom of religion doesn't trump freedom, full stop. And that's where they get themselves tied up in knots, not that they realize it themselves until it comes home to roost.

I don't know what the answer is. But I wish this country would stop legislating from the church pulpit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's called "grasping at straws" because all your other Warpy Mar 2013 #1
+1 LiberalLoner Mar 2013 #3
That's not to say certain conservatives don't dump their wives after child-bearing age Tab Mar 2013 #7
I suppose at one point it might have been about having children gollygee Mar 2013 #2
Hey, I got my nuts clipped 18 years ago, but it is still fun to practice. talkingmime Mar 2013 #4
+1 Blue_Tires Mar 2013 #19
it's hardly new . . . that argument has been around for years DrDan Mar 2013 #5
Stupid argument .... Trajan Mar 2013 #6
When I asked the procreation question to someone on Twitter justiceischeap Mar 2013 #8
play the wingnut game rickford66 Mar 2013 #9
Gotta mask all their hate somehow, so lame excuse time again. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #10
As much as I loathe her for even existing and spewing her incessant shit, Ruby the Liberal Mar 2013 #11
They really didn't fuck up. The 1%, who got a lot of mileage out of Teh Gay eridani Mar 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Iggo Mar 2013 #12
I think it might be about controlling others, to restrict freedoms we have. Thinkingabout Mar 2013 #13
Actually, it was rearely about "love" until recently... TreasonousBastard Mar 2013 #14
As far as the government is concerned, marriage is nothing more than a piece of paper Major Nikon Mar 2013 #16
Marriage for the early Church was worldly, not a desirable attribute for spiritual growth. MissMarple Mar 2013 #17
No marriage for anyone over 50 then. n/t cherokeeprogressive Mar 2013 #18
That would leave out first cousins in about 9 states. LiberalFighter Apr 2013 #23
That isn't what they are arguing. duffyduff Mar 2013 #20
It is such a weak and tortured argument. morningfog Mar 2013 #21
I shut down an anti-gay religious extremist who tried this argument on me once magellan Mar 2013 #22
Hehehe. Good one. freshwest Apr 2013 #24
I was surprised I even had to point out the flaw in his thinking magellan Apr 2013 #25
I was re-reading The Age Of Reason by my fave, Thomas Paine. The introduction says: freshwest Apr 2013 #26
Love it magellan Apr 2013 #27
The only people threatening the marriage of others are the bigots gtar100 Apr 2013 #28
I'm straight and married and I have no intention of procreating davidpdx Apr 2013 #29
Yeah, get divorced Tab Apr 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's this new crap abou...»Reply #27