General Discussion

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

55. Why Sid, one might get the impression you didn't tell us what the facts were

Reply to SidDithers (Reply #51)

Mon Apr 1, 2013, 10:45 AM

Apr 2013

that you keep talking about and you thought no one would notice if you used the old 'you're following me' tactic.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Michael Taylor: Monsanto's Man? [View all] G_j Mar 2013 OP

. blkmusclmachine Mar 2013 #1

2009? WonderGrunion Mar 2013 #2

Please read the rest of the Wiki article jazzimov Mar 2013 #3

thanks for that, jazzimov Cha Mar 2013 #5

Thanks for what? sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #47

CEO??? One of the 99 Apr 2013 #54

Facts are good... SidDithers Mar 2013 #8

So what are these facts you keep talking about but never enlighten us about? sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #48

Why, sabrina. One might get the impression you're following me from thread to thread... SidDithers Apr 2013 #51

Why Sid, one might get the impression you didn't tell us what the facts were sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #55

Translation: A PR firm working for Monsanto edited the Wikipedia article brentspeak Mar 2013 #11

But I thought facts are facts UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2013 #18

Yes, they do it all the time. Lol, I have already asked people NOT to sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #49

Oh...so he recused himself for a whole year... zeemike Mar 2013 #13

Will readers get your sarcasm? roody Mar 2013 #32

You did. zeemike Mar 2013 #36

Monsanto has it fingers everywhere. progressoid Mar 2013 #4

Are Monsanto Employees or former employees the only ones Heather MC Mar 2013 #6

Including on Wikipedia! sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #50

assistance in Africa. In collusion with the Rockefeller/ Bill and Melinda Gates foundations lunasun Mar 2013 #7

Interlockitude Berlum Mar 2013 #9

If Michael Taylor were the oNLY "Monsanto Man" appointed to hgh positions ... bvar22 Mar 2013 #10

If only ProSense Mar 2013 #23

ProSense, you make NoSense. bvar22 Mar 2013 #33

Wait, ProSense Mar 2013 #37

YOU are making NoSense. bvar22 Mar 2013 #40

Of course it's true. It's also completely irrelevant tkmorris Apr 2013 #46

bill and malinda gates timdog44 Mar 2013 #12

facts can be falsified. timdog44 Mar 2013 #14

This is an interesting quote: Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #15

"Reviled by whom?" brentspeak Mar 2013 #16

I wonder how many of those 250,000 had a clue of what was actually in that provision... Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #17

Do you speak in favor timdog44 Mar 2013 #21

Absolutely. I have no fears of GMOs, those released by Monsanto or others. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #26

Sad to hear. timdog44 Mar 2013 #29

Hm. More unsubstantiated rumors. This is no shortage of them. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #34

I am not timdog44 Apr 2013 #45

Probably most of them brentspeak Mar 2013 #22

Ok. That was meant as an insult, and I'll take it as one. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #27

+1,000 Scuba Apr 2013 #53

Agreed. GMO timdog44 Mar 2013 #19

I'd hardly call it "infiltration". More like obeying corporate overlords. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #24

True. n/t timdog44 Mar 2013 #25

What the hell ProSense Mar 2013 #20

"The people who signed that petition likely have no clue about his work..." brentspeak Mar 2013 #28

Again, ProSense Mar 2013 #30

So, according to you, the petition signers are nothing but uneducated rubes brentspeak Mar 2013 #38

No, ProSense Mar 2013 #39

Yes, you really did in effect say that the 250,000 petition signers are uneducated rubes brentspeak Mar 2013 #41

No, I didn't, and ProSense Mar 2013 #42

Other people understood my post clearly enough brentspeak Mar 2013 #43

You ProSense Mar 2013 #44

you seem to be missing the fact G_j Apr 2013 #52

Since everyone knew about the rider for one year, a petition was prepared sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #56

the same people who were concerned G_j Mar 2013 #31

And if they are so proud timdog44 Mar 2013 #35