Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

AsahinaKimi

(20,776 posts)
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 11:30 AM Apr 2013

U.S. Navy’s carriers costly relics of the past? [View all]


Ghost ship?: The USS Enterprise sails in the Strait of Gibraltar in October 2012. The Enterprise, the world's first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, was decommissioned on Dec. 1. | AFP-JIJI

WASHINGTON – Budget pressures at the Pentagon have renewed a debate about the value of the U.S. Navy’s giant aircraft carriers, with critics arguing the warships are fast becoming costly relics in a new era of warfare.

With the Pentagon facing $500 billion in cuts over the next decade, a navy officer has dared to question the most treasured vessels in his service’s fleet, saying the supercarriers are increasingly vulnerable to new weapons and too expensive to operate.

“After 100 years, the carrier is rapidly approaching the end of its useful strategic life,” wrote Capt. Henry Hendrix in a report published in March by the Center for a New American Security.

Changes in naval warfare mean that carriers “may not be able to move close enough to targets to operate effectively or survive in an era of satellite imagery and long-range precision strike missiles,” Hendrix wrote.

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/04/02/world/u-s-navys-carriers-costly-relics-of-the-past/#.UVmoHzeDo5h
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And they lost their battleships years ago. What are the poor admirals... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #1
Probably use these.. AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #2
Those are meant for close-to-shore action and the Navy just called them "underpowered". talkingmime Apr 2013 #3
An aircraft carrier comes with a flotila of battleships? Brother Buzz Apr 2013 #4
He probably meant warships. I always find it amusing when people get the two terms mixed octothorpe Apr 2013 #5
A modern carrier battle group comes with: backscatter712 Apr 2013 #7
A Carrier Task Force usually consists of premium Apr 2013 #8
Very expensive, which is why I predict we'll be cutting back on them. backscatter712 Apr 2013 #11
I think it's down to 10. premium Apr 2013 #14
The expense is a big one. backscatter712 Apr 2013 #9
The navy has about a dozen helocopter carriers also The Second Stone Apr 2013 #10
I thought the trimeran lose the design competition HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #6
no idea AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #12
Battleships became passe' when carriers became the weapon to defeat them... Javaman Apr 2013 #13
Name the last full size carrier "defeated" by a cruise missile zipplewrath Apr 2013 #16
We haven't had a "carrier" war since WWII. Javaman Apr 2013 #17
Name another "carrier based state" zipplewrath Apr 2013 #18
There are none, so what's the point in arguing? Javaman Apr 2013 #19
The discussion was carrier obsolesence zipplewrath Apr 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers Apr 2013 #15
If we want a blue water navy, we need carriers. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #21
HEH AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Navy’s carriers cost...