Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

talkingmime

(2,173 posts)

3. Those are meant for close-to-shore action and the Navy just called them "underpowered".

Reply to AsahinaKimi (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 1, 2013, 01:48 PM

Apr 2013

Specifically, they meant that they don't have enough firepower to be effective in the arena they are intended for. I can't imagine why they would want to do away with aircraft carriers, and keep in mind that an aircraft carrier comes with a flotila of battleships, scouts, and other ships. It's never alone. We've only got ten in service now, but that's nearly half of all of the 22 such ships in the world. I don't see them going away.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Navy�s carriers costly relics of the past? [View all] AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 OP

And they lost their battleships years ago. What are the poor admirals... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #1

Probably use these.. AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #2

Those are meant for close-to-shore action and the Navy just called them "underpowered". talkingmime Apr 2013 #3

An aircraft carrier comes with a flotila of battleships? Brother Buzz Apr 2013 #4

He probably meant warships. I always find it amusing when people get the two terms mixed octothorpe Apr 2013 #5

A modern carrier battle group comes with: backscatter712 Apr 2013 #7

A Carrier Task Force usually consists of premium Apr 2013 #8

Very expensive, which is why I predict we'll be cutting back on them. backscatter712 Apr 2013 #11

I think it's down to 10. premium Apr 2013 #14

The expense is a big one. backscatter712 Apr 2013 #9

The navy has about a dozen helocopter carriers also The Second Stone Apr 2013 #10

I thought the trimeran lose the design competition HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #6

no idea AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #12

Battleships became passe' when carriers became the weapon to defeat them... Javaman Apr 2013 #13

Name the last full size carrier "defeated" by a cruise missile zipplewrath Apr 2013 #16

We haven't had a "carrier" war since WWII. Javaman Apr 2013 #17

Name another "carrier based state" zipplewrath Apr 2013 #18

There are none, so what's the point in arguing? Javaman Apr 2013 #19

The discussion was carrier obsolesence zipplewrath Apr 2013 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers Apr 2013 #15

If we want a blue water navy, we need carriers. Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #21

HEH AsahinaKimi Apr 2013 #22