Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pope’s Foot-Wash a Final Straw for Traditionalist Catholics [View all]caseymoz
(5,763 posts)62. He's "narrowly" infallible.
The church has exact rules on when he's infallible:
Thus, when the Pope
1. intends to teach,
2. as head of the Church,
3. on matters pertaining to faith or morals
4. and the teaching is addressed to the whole Church
When he makes a pronouncement, and the Church lawyers look at the rules, and determine that he wasn't doing one or more of the above, he's human.
It's only at those magical times when the lawyers decide that all those conditions are met, that he's infallible and always speaks the truth.
In practice, nobody ever knows in real time if the Pope is being infallible or not. So, if Catholics don't want go to Hell, they just better presume he's infallible all the time. That way, he gets all the adoration of being infallible, and none of the responsibility.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But only when he declares a doctrine "ex cathedra" which has only happened twice in history. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2013
#15
Infallibility's only been invoked a handful of times in the last few centuries anyway.
Posteritatis
Mar 2013
#31
Only when he makes a statement "ex cathedra" -- that is, under certain specific conditions
pnwmom
Mar 2013
#14
You seem to follow Jesus' teachings a lot better than that sarcastic "explainer." nt
SunSeeker
Apr 2013
#59
Yes, Bob Forbid anyone should confuse gibberish with religious dogma.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#50
Yeah, cause the Catholic Church is so bad, we can blame for it shit it does not even believe.
Drahthaardogs
Apr 2013
#64
What am I arguing? I made a joke about the indistinguishability of religious dogma from gibberish.
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#74
No, economics deals with things that are real. Money is real. Labor is real. Buying, selling,
Warren DeMontague
Apr 2013
#73
The nature of what we refer to as "proof", upon which all rational empiricism, that is, what
patrice
Apr 2013
#95
You do realize that your "source" asked when the Pope issues an encyclical, right?
Drahthaardogs
Apr 2013
#109
The problem is that if you say things that are demonstrably untrue
Fortinbras Armstrong
Apr 2013
#94
These people act as if there's nothing wrong with the Church that returning to tradition can't fix
BeyondGeography
Mar 2013
#26
Hopefully traditionalist Catholics and Teabaggers will be thrown in the dustbin of history.
Crowman1979
Mar 2013
#28
Sell all that you have and give it to the poor. Waiting on something real, not a photo-op NT
broadcaster75201
Mar 2013
#29
I want to somehow use "spittle-flecked nutty" in daily conversation. LOL n/t
Beartracks
Apr 2013
#35
Some powers-that-be of the RCC are going to be dragged out of the 3rd century screaming and kicking.
bulloney
Apr 2013
#40
Even the most faithful Catholics realize that there something dreadfully wrong.
olegramps
Apr 2013
#47
Yeah, who the hell needs a Mass you can understand and SHARE by participating in it?
patrice
Apr 2013
#77
I did that kind of stuff 6 days a week for 12 years of my life: Gregorian Chant, sacristan, Legion
patrice
Apr 2013
#83