Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
36. Four decades is as good a guess as any I've found.
Mon Apr 1, 2013, 11:16 PM
Apr 2013

What a nice non-industry thinker found is that radioactivity will continue to spew until then:



Fukushima: Living With the Consequences

BY GAR SMITH – MARCH 11, 2013


An excerpt from Nuclear Roulette: The Truth about the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth

This time no one dropped a bomb on us. . . . We set the stage, we committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives.

—Haruki Murakami, Japanese novelist


EXCERPT...

Tokyo spent $3 billion on decontamination work in 2011 and expected to spend twice that amount in 2012. The cost for decontaminating the area around the damaged reactors is projected to exceed $13 billion and take 40 years. Professor Tatsuhiko Kodama of the University of Tokyo’s Radioisotope Center projects that a responsible cleanup all the land poisoned by TEPCO’s fallout could cost nearly $10 trillion.

Although the government utterly failed to accurately inform the public about the radioactivity contained in food and certain consumer goods, Tokyo’s leaders now insist that it is safe for some refugees to leave their relocation squats and begin returning home. To justify this, Tokyo has determined that radiation levels 10 times greater than pre-accident background radiation can now be considered “safe.” Fukushima governor Yuhei Sato urged displaced residents to return to their homes and even offered returning evacuees the promise of job opportunities. These include “decontamination jobs.”

Fallout in the Waves

While the ocean’s impact on Fukushima was sudden and specific, Fukushima's environmental impacts on the ocean will be widespread and long lasting. In the first, desperate days of the reactor calamity, the failure of emergency cooling systems on the General Electric Mark I reactors forced TEPCO to cool the seething reactor cores with seawater. With no place to store the irradiated coolant, TEPCO dumped a million gallons (11,500 tons) of seawater back into the Pacific Ocean—with radiation levels 7.5 million times the legal limit. TEPCO told the public that no more than 15,000 terabecquerels had been released into the ocean, but the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) subsequently placed the estimate closer to 27,000 terabecquerels.

China’s State Oceanic Administration reported finding nearly 100,000 square miles of the Pacific tainted with radioactive iodine, strontium, and cesium at levels 300 times above normal. (Cesium-137 is absorbed by phytoplankton, zooplankton, and kelp that are ingested by fish, marine mammals, and humans.) On December 1, 2011, the IRSN reported that the Fukushima disaster had caused the worst ocean contamination in world history—100 times greater that Chernobyl’s pollution of the Black Sea.

In the first days following the accident, nearly 13,500 terabecquerels of seaborne cesium-137 were expected to pass the Philippines before turning north and heading east along the Kuroshio current.Computer models indicated that the huge swirl of radioactive water was heading for Hawaii and could reach the West Coast of North America by early 2013. But it took only a month for airborne radioactive iodine-131 to show up in kelp beds off the West Coast; California State University scientists found levels 250 times normal in kelp sampled in the waters off southern California.

CONTINUED...

http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/fukushima_living_with_the_consequences/



I'd feel a lot better if Japan, the United States, China and whoever else has info would open it up for all to see and think about. As it stands, like in Voodoo Economics, we have to rely on trickle-down science.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When I went to the link, the article is dated 3/28/2011 PearliePoo2 Mar 2013 #1
Thank you. It IS. My mistake. Octafish Mar 2013 #2
Just one of those things dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #4
Thanks. I like running a Public Service Announcement on Plutonium... Octafish Mar 2013 #5
Associated links are 2011 too. dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #3
i was wondering why excess radiation from japan would just be showing up *now*. HiPointDem Mar 2013 #25
Even though the article was written in 2011 Oilwellian Mar 2013 #6
More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis Octafish Mar 2013 #7
I wondered why we had stopped monitoring so soon. This may explain that. Overseas Mar 2013 #30
As pointed out, the article is dated nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #8
Right. marions ghost Mar 2013 #10
Radiation within 80 km of No. 1 plant said down by half Octafish Mar 2013 #14
Iirc two week ago we had a story of fish nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #16
Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved. Octafish Mar 2013 #18
Patches are hyper local papers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2013 #19
5 Easy Ways to Spot a B.S. News Story on the Internet SidDithers Mar 2013 #9
So what? 'CRACKED' is a second-rate 'MAD' magazine. Octafish Mar 2013 #12
Just wondering why you tried to misrepresent the contributor's blog as a Forbes article...nt SidDithers Mar 2013 #13
Thanks for your concern. It was on a Forbes website. Octafish Mar 2013 #15
Sid, I want to see your journal! zappaman Mar 2013 #21
What scares BFEE most is people learning about them. Octafish Mar 2013 #22
Yes! zappaman Mar 2013 #24
It's rhetorical. Do you ever post anything that adds to what we know about the BFEE, zappaman? Octafish Mar 2013 #26
K&R. More news that I missed. Overseas Mar 2013 #29
That's one thing about I like about GD, we can talk about important stuff. Octafish Mar 2013 #32
...and more will soon be on the way from N Korea. n/t L0oniX Mar 2013 #11
I pray not. Warmongers on both sides believe nuclear war is winnable. Octafish Mar 2013 #17
K&R Kurovski Mar 2013 #20
It's the strangest thing, getting mocked on account of the BFEE. Octafish Mar 2013 #23
I heard about that on Prison Planet. That's some mundo scary stuff there. freshwest Mar 2013 #34
I see that you realized one mistake. FBaggins Mar 2013 #27
Like, really. Compared to three meltdowns and exposed spent fuel pools, I did a bad. Octafish Mar 2013 #31
No I didn't catch the story on my local news. Overseas Mar 2013 #28
Here's something about nuclear war no one at Easter dinner knew about... Octafish Mar 2013 #33
How many years is Fukushima expected to keep releasing radiation? Trillo Apr 2013 #35
Four decades is as good a guess as any I've found. Octafish Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA: Expect More Radiatio...»Reply #36