Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: EPA: Expect More Radiation in Rainwater [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)36. Four decades is as good a guess as any I've found.
What a nice non-industry thinker found is that radioactivity will continue to spew until then:
Fukushima: Living With the Consequences
BY GAR SMITH MARCH 11, 2013
An excerpt from Nuclear Roulette: The Truth about the Most Dangerous Energy Source on Earth
This time no one dropped a bomb on us. . . . We set the stage, we committed the crime with our own hands, we are destroying our own lands, and we are destroying our own lives.
Haruki Murakami, Japanese novelist
EXCERPT...
Tokyo spent $3 billion on decontamination work in 2011 and expected to spend twice that amount in 2012. The cost for decontaminating the area around the damaged reactors is projected to exceed $13 billion and take 40 years. Professor Tatsuhiko Kodama of the University of Tokyos Radioisotope Center projects that a responsible cleanup all the land poisoned by TEPCOs fallout could cost nearly $10 trillion.
Although the government utterly failed to accurately inform the public about the radioactivity contained in food and certain consumer goods, Tokyos leaders now insist that it is safe for some refugees to leave their relocation squats and begin returning home. To justify this, Tokyo has determined that radiation levels 10 times greater than pre-accident background radiation can now be considered safe. Fukushima governor Yuhei Sato urged displaced residents to return to their homes and even offered returning evacuees the promise of job opportunities. These include decontamination jobs.
Fallout in the Waves
While the oceans impact on Fukushima was sudden and specific, Fukushima's environmental impacts on the ocean will be widespread and long lasting. In the first, desperate days of the reactor calamity, the failure of emergency cooling systems on the General Electric Mark I reactors forced TEPCO to cool the seething reactor cores with seawater. With no place to store the irradiated coolant, TEPCO dumped a million gallons (11,500 tons) of seawater back into the Pacific Oceanwith radiation levels 7.5 million times the legal limit. TEPCO told the public that no more than 15,000 terabecquerels had been released into the ocean, but the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) subsequently placed the estimate closer to 27,000 terabecquerels.
Chinas State Oceanic Administration reported finding nearly 100,000 square miles of the Pacific tainted with radioactive iodine, strontium, and cesium at levels 300 times above normal. (Cesium-137 is absorbed by phytoplankton, zooplankton, and kelp that are ingested by fish, marine mammals, and humans.) On December 1, 2011, the IRSN reported that the Fukushima disaster had caused the worst ocean contamination in world history100 times greater that Chernobyls pollution of the Black Sea.
In the first days following the accident, nearly 13,500 terabecquerels of seaborne cesium-137 were expected to pass the Philippines before turning north and heading east along the Kuroshio current.Computer models indicated that the huge swirl of radioactive water was heading for Hawaii and could reach the West Coast of North America by early 2013. But it took only a month for airborne radioactive iodine-131 to show up in kelp beds off the West Coast; California State University scientists found levels 250 times normal in kelp sampled in the waters off southern California.
CONTINUED...
http://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/elist/eListRead/fukushima_living_with_the_consequences/
I'd feel a lot better if Japan, the United States, China and whoever else has info would open it up for all to see and think about. As it stands, like in Voodoo Economics, we have to rely on trickle-down science.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
i was wondering why excess radiation from japan would just be showing up *now*.
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#25
More old news: Audit Confirms EPA Radiation Monitors Broken During Fukushima Crisis
Octafish
Mar 2013
#7
Many people mistakenly believe since Fukushima is not on the tee vee, the 'problem' is solved.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#18
Just wondering why you tried to misrepresent the contributor's blog as a Forbes article...nt
SidDithers
Mar 2013
#13
It's rhetorical. Do you ever post anything that adds to what we know about the BFEE, zappaman?
Octafish
Mar 2013
#26
Like, really. Compared to three meltdowns and exposed spent fuel pools, I did a bad.
Octafish
Mar 2013
#31