Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Monsanto Protection Act': 5 Terrifying Things To Know About The HR 933 Provision [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)1. If it's
"terrifying, why did Democrats vote to pass the bill and send it to the President: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022582817
"Terrifying items 3 and 4:
3.) Many members of Congress were apparently unaware that the "Monsanto Protection Act" even existed within the bill they were voting on. HR 933 was a spending bill aimed at averting a government shutdown and ensuring that the federal government would continue to be able to pay its bills. But the Center for Food Safety maintains that many Democrats in Congress were not even aware that the provision was in the legislation:
<...>
4.) The President did nothing to stop it, either. On Tuesday, Obama signed HR 933 while the rest of the nation was fixated on gay marriage, as the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument concerning California's Proposition 8. But just because most of the nation and the media were paying attention to gay marriage doesn't mean that others were not doing their best to express their opposition to the "Monsanto Protection Act." In fact, more than 250,000 voters signed a petition opposing the provision. And Food Democracy Now protesters even took their fight straight to Obama, protesting in front of the White House against Section 735 of the bill. He signed it anyway.
<...>
4.) The President did nothing to stop it, either. On Tuesday, Obama signed HR 933 while the rest of the nation was fixated on gay marriage, as the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument concerning California's Proposition 8. But just because most of the nation and the media were paying attention to gay marriage doesn't mean that others were not doing their best to express their opposition to the "Monsanto Protection Act." In fact, more than 250,000 voters signed a petition opposing the provision. And Food Democracy Now protesters even took their fight straight to Obama, protesting in front of the White House against Section 735 of the bill. He signed it anyway.
Item 3, is absurd and not terrifying.
Item 4 is ludicrous. I mean, keeping the government from shutting down, "gay marriage, as the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument concerning California's Proposition 8" should have taken a back seat to this faux outrage.
More information on the Monsanto rider. Also Democratic budget supports labeling.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022576338
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Monsanto Protection Act': 5 Terrifying Things To Know About The HR 933 Provision [View all]
UnrepentantLiberal
Apr 2013
OP
Yes, you did. Just like I never mentioned Bush to Republicans since issues for me
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#23
"patently absurd and utterly silly" are not very strong arguments. Sounds more like opinion.
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#63
+ 1000! Perhaps we owe them an apology for being so wrong all the time? nt
raouldukelives
Apr 2013
#56
Do you think it's absurd that Obama has Monsanto executives in his Administration?
UnrepentantLiberal
Apr 2013
#20
Let's compare arguments. One side says that Pres Obama seems too friendly to Monsanto and
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#93
Oh Gawd! The old familiar right wing talking points against Liberals make their
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#68
Martyrs, all over the place, on the Left! And when challenged, no 'it's just you'!
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#75
reverse psych...you've been doing it a lot in the last few posts. It's obvious and a fail n/t
Sheepshank
Apr 2013
#84
When something is a 'fail' shouldn't you just ignore it because if you're right
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#89
Why dont you direct your comments towards issues instead of trying to ridicule posters?
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#109
you have no clue what you are talking about...you have no background on any of this
Sheepshank
Apr 2013
#119
I have read your posts and wonder why you are in this thread? Is your intent to discuss
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#121
I have stated clearly in this thread that I dont like Monsanto's GMO. And I dont like Monsanto
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#123
Oh look. Prosense Logic! ........ Prosense, Newspeak, Doubleplusgood!
woo me with science
Apr 2013
#28
Actually, I don't see anything that would cause the provision to expire in six months
onenote
Apr 2013
#65
So, all the lack of scientific understanding behind this hysteria doesn't bother you?
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#79
I have no comment on the legislation, but you continue to ignore my question:
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#96
"Every day, every day, we sink deeper into the nightmare of a corporate-controlled State."
Occulus
Apr 2013
#76
The "monsanto" provision is bad legislation,but the article in the OP is riddled with errors
onenote
Apr 2013
#48
Move to Peru. They've banned ALL GMO's. Btw. Some GMO foods actually save many who would starve due
judesedit
Apr 2013
#52
And the other one, 'why won't they label their products'? You would think they
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#77
Please feel free to accept the challenge: quote me where I defended Monsanto.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#97
Poutrage ... another made up word people think is 'cool'. Anyhow, tell it to Sen.
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#111