Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Monsanto Protection Act': 5 Terrifying Things To Know About The HR 933 Provision [View all]raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)56. + 1000! Perhaps we owe them an apology for being so wrong all the time? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Monsanto Protection Act': 5 Terrifying Things To Know About The HR 933 Provision [View all]
UnrepentantLiberal
Apr 2013
OP
Yes, you did. Just like I never mentioned Bush to Republicans since issues for me
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#23
"patently absurd and utterly silly" are not very strong arguments. Sounds more like opinion.
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#63
+ 1000! Perhaps we owe them an apology for being so wrong all the time? nt
raouldukelives
Apr 2013
#56
Do you think it's absurd that Obama has Monsanto executives in his Administration?
UnrepentantLiberal
Apr 2013
#20
Let's compare arguments. One side says that Pres Obama seems too friendly to Monsanto and
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#93
Oh Gawd! The old familiar right wing talking points against Liberals make their
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#68
Martyrs, all over the place, on the Left! And when challenged, no 'it's just you'!
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#75
reverse psych...you've been doing it a lot in the last few posts. It's obvious and a fail n/t
Sheepshank
Apr 2013
#84
When something is a 'fail' shouldn't you just ignore it because if you're right
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#89
Why dont you direct your comments towards issues instead of trying to ridicule posters?
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#109
you have no clue what you are talking about...you have no background on any of this
Sheepshank
Apr 2013
#119
I have read your posts and wonder why you are in this thread? Is your intent to discuss
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#121
I have stated clearly in this thread that I dont like Monsanto's GMO. And I dont like Monsanto
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#123
Oh look. Prosense Logic! ........ Prosense, Newspeak, Doubleplusgood!
woo me with science
Apr 2013
#28
Actually, I don't see anything that would cause the provision to expire in six months
onenote
Apr 2013
#65
So, all the lack of scientific understanding behind this hysteria doesn't bother you?
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#79
I have no comment on the legislation, but you continue to ignore my question:
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#96
"Every day, every day, we sink deeper into the nightmare of a corporate-controlled State."
Occulus
Apr 2013
#76
The "monsanto" provision is bad legislation,but the article in the OP is riddled with errors
onenote
Apr 2013
#48
Move to Peru. They've banned ALL GMO's. Btw. Some GMO foods actually save many who would starve due
judesedit
Apr 2013
#52
And the other one, 'why won't they label their products'? You would think they
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#77
Please feel free to accept the challenge: quote me where I defended Monsanto.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#97
Poutrage ... another made up word people think is 'cool'. Anyhow, tell it to Sen.
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#111